Luongo’s Theory of Everything – Breaking European Money


The point of the rate hikes is to break the Old European Money.

One year ago (in June) Powell raised the Reverse Repo Rate, which meant draining the world of offshore dollar liquidity. The offshore dollar market is orders of magnitude bigger than the domestic dollar market. Once that started it broke the Euro bull market–the Euro started dropping. That followed Powell telling the rest of the world bankers that he was not going to coordinate monetary policy to “fight climate change” (the key Christine Lagarde thing). However, Powell wasn’t able to start the rate hike cycle until he was reconfirmed in March (because much of the US political class, in the Dem controlled government, were Davos lackeys who were opposed to a second term for Powell).

The offshore dollar markets are run by the Old European Banks, so they’re the ones must vulnerable to rate hikes. (Offshore dollars, not the Euro—which the ECB destroyed—are the true source of European power as it remains.) The ECB has held deposit rates at -6% for eight years, destroying the Euro as a reserve currency. $14 trillion of European sovereign debt was trading at a negative yield. Meanwhile, the EU created a narrative that the US was beset by political instability, in an effort to prevent capital from fleeing to the US.

Davos’ plan for a CBDC etc. was designed to do away with commercial banking. You can’t have technocratic European style communism without destroying the two tiered monetary transition system–central banks to commercial banks to retail money users. Davos wants to collapse that two tiered system by removing the commercial banks via CBDC.

The Fed works for the biggest commercial banks in the world. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Citigroup, etc. The most powerful political lobby in the world is the same guys. Same guys control the Southern District of NY. Same guys control Fed policy. I asked guys who had literally been bankrupted by Dimon and Blankfein and the rest: Can you really see Dimon turning the keys of JPMorgan over to Klaus Schwab?

The source of the WEF’s real power is the ability to lever up offshore dollars to buy political influence, to buy governments and their budgets, etc. The Fed is intent on screwing the Europeans to put a stop to this. Putting an end to European internecine wars is fine, but doing it by developing a technocratic USSR just with more Germans is a bad idea.

Europeans have destroyed their own economies, which were built on cheap stuff from China and cheap energy from Russia. This destruction was ongoing even before the sanctions war, which has simply accelerated the process.

The whole Amsterdam electricity and natural gas pricing market screwed the European energy system by getting out of long term energy contracts. They screwed up before sanctions. This change from contracts that were as long as 30 years, and the switch to spot prices, destroyed stability in the energy market. The directors are corrupt, from a clearing board in London. Energy prices have gone through the roof. But this is part of a plan.

What’s behind all this is the need to default on European debt. The problem: How can you get the fiscally conservative German middle class to go along? The European banks are bankrupt, and they can’t get cheap money from the Fed anymore. This: bankrupt the German middle class through sky high energy prices, blame Putin for it, then tell the public–we’re going to nationalize the energy companies that are screwing you the public (already underway in Germany and being proposed in the US), then offer subsidies to the public. It’s a backdoor QE.

European countries need to default on sovereign debt because it can’t be paid. The pension systems are broke. Soros has laid out the plan. They’ll default on the debt, issue perpetual bonds, then issue a digital Euro. The European middle class is faced with a Hobson’s choice: You can either have debt forgiveness, or freeze/starve to death. Living standards will collapse. Political and economic control will be rolled into the EC and collapsing the member banks into the ECB and requiring them to turn over their gold.

AK: What’s behind this is a structural energy crisis–all the West’s militaries are convinced they’re running out of oil. They envision total economic collapse, as stated in position papers. They know they can’t control the main energy producers, so they plan on setting society on a totally different energy basis. The mad schemes being implemented are part of the agenda to transition to a nuclear/hydrogen economy. We’ll move to a U-233 cycle. Brexit and Trump accelerated the transition.

Trump understood what was going on, in his own Trumpian way. He’s savvy, but not that savvy. But Davos lost control of the process the day Trump put Jay Powell in charge of the Fed. Powell started the process of decoupling the Fed from the EU system.

The overall goal of Davos is world government through the UN and the IMF–that’s been clearly stated. The commercial banks in the US saw that they couldn’t stop this process (which would result in their destruction) through the normal political process because the US political classes were in the pocket of the WEF. Thus Powell’s war on Europe. (Thus, for Davos to push their scheme through, they must bring the Fed and NY commercial banks to heel by bankrupting the US through massive deficity spending and importation of millions of illegals. See below. Trump had upset the Davos applecart.)

AK: Leaving the gold standard made the collapse of paper currencies to zero inevitable. To avoid the discipline of gold, the plan is CBDC. Keep people in a digital slave colony. The fracture in the plan happened when the NY commercial banks and the Fed refused to go along. The result is fractures within the ruling elites–especially in Europe, with conflicting interests. Their plans aren’t working out, and they’re having to improvise, leading to disarray.

Some Americans support this Davos plan–Bank of America and Bank of NY Mellon are the prime examples. They went to Davos 2022. Notice that JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Citgroup, Wells Fargo, didn’t go to Davos 2022. They didn’t even send VPs. Mary Erdoes from JPMorgan didn’t go. Jamie Dimon certainly didn’t go–that’s a big tell.

If you read what the Davos crowd are telling you, they’re telling you flat out they want to control the world. Read Christine Lagarde, Klaus Schwab, George Soros, Mark Carney–they’re the lieutenants for the people who actually control things. It’s really the cartel of banks that have been running the world for a long, long time. We now have a struggle between two different groups of bankers for control of the West, of capital. On one side: JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and–I think now–Morgan Stanley are aligned with the Fed. These are also the primary shareholders in the NY Fed. On the other hand you have Larry Fink of Blackrock, Bank of America, Bank of NY Mellon and a few others, plus the European banks. Then there are some caught in the middle, such as Credit Suisse–cause they’re clearly going after the Swiss, and Swiss privacy.

The key is: Who is most vulnerable to a rate shock? American monetary policy for most of the post WW2 period was controlled by the offshore dollar markets, the Eurodollar markets, through LIBOR. Up until this year Eurodollar debt was indexed to LIBOR (London banks)–not to any index that had anything to do with American banking health. SOFR (Secure Overnight Funding Rate), instituted under Powell, changed that. All US debt is now indexed to SOFR. Europe can “catch a cold” but that no longer necessarily affects American banks.

The institution of SOFR to decouple US rates from European rates (based on LIBOR) is what has made it possible for the Fed to keep raising rates without unfairly affecting US markets. The Fed will keep raising to break Europe, because if they don’t the US as a functional society will collapse. The US rates are sucking liquidity out of Europe’s giant Eurodollar market (Europe is forced to raise rates to try to stop this, but it won’t work because they’re already bankrupt and can’t afford the huge increases in debt payments to finance government deficits). This will provide the US with a softer landing, despite the high interest rates. The US won’t be starved of liquidity, but Europe will be broken because they can’t afford the higher rates.

The US is owned by foreign powers–not China, but Old European Banking Money, which controls the Zhou administration.

Read Murray Rothbardthe history of US foreign policy is largely the history of British foreign policy. Removing the US from LIBOR is why Trump had to be removed from power–the US was finally declaring independence. A Dem majority government had to be put back in place to push through the Great Reset in the US immediately (Zhou campaigned on this under the slogan Build Back Better).

“Now, this will bake your noodle.”

With the failure of Build Back Better, which was another attempt (after Covid) to force the Fed to monetize $6 trillion dollars worth of debt, the Fed got the room to further its agenda. This is why Davos is pushing so hard to get the US involved in a war with Russia. The new plan to bankrupt America is to force the Fed to finance the war and reverse interest rates and thereby neuter the Fed–Davos’ enemy. Danielle DiMartino Booth has been saying for months that Jay Powell is trying to do a controlled demolition of the leveraged loan market–she won’t openly say that this demolition is aimed at ‘in the offshore dollar markets’, she can’t say that out loud. So, with the end of the Covid Regime and the failure to fully fund Build Back Better, Davos’s dilemma was how to find a mechanism that would force the Fed to finance another $6 trillion? The answer was the war on Russia, and the means to draw the US further into this insane war is being provided by the escalating series of UK inspired and led provocations. These “false flag” events staged by the Brits—Kerch Bridge, Nordstream, Sevastopol, constant nuclear hype—are designed to get the US into the UK’s war. (For further confirmation just look at the non-stop propaganda emenating from the UK media.)

The Zhou admin and the State Department are Davos’ useful idiots.

Swiss study shows heart injury in all mRNA COVID jab recipients, myocarditis in 3%


(The Daily Sceptic) — New evidence has emerged that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are routinely injuring the hearts of all vaccine recipients, raising further questions about their safety and their role in the recent elevated levels of heart-related deaths.

The latest evidence comes in a study from Switzerland, which found elevated troponin levels – indicating heart injury – across all vaccinated people, with 2.8 percent showing levels associated with subclinical myocarditis.

The official line on elevated heart injuries and deaths, where they are acknowledged, is that they are most likely caused by the virus as a post-COVID condition rather than the vaccines.

However, expert group HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team) has pointed to Australia as a “control group” on this question. HART noted that even though Australia had not had significant COVID (only 30,000 reported infections and 910 deaths) prior to mid-2021, it still saw a trend in excess non-COVID deaths beginning in June 2021 (see below). HART noted that Australia “did not have prior COVID as a reason for seeing this rise in mortality and hospital pressure from spring 2021.” Instead, “the results from this control group indicate that the cause of this rise in deaths, particularly in young people, must be something in common with Australia, Europe, and the USA.”

C/O: The Daily Sceptic

In New Zealand, economist John Gibson found a temporal association between boosters and excess deaths, estimating “16 excess deaths per 100,000 booster doses” (see below). He noted that the age distribution of the deaths corroborated the hypothesis: “The age groups most likely to use boosters show large rises in excess mortality after boosters are rolled out.”

C/O: The Daily Sceptic

In Japan, Guy Gin reports that Professor Seiji Kojima of Nagoya University found the same correlation during the booster rollout in January to March 2022 (see below) – a time when most excess deaths were not with COVID.

C/O: The Daily Sceptic

In Israel, a study in Nature observed a similar trend for 16–39 year-olds, with cardiac arrest emergency calls rising and falling with the first and second doses and then rising and falling again after doses for recovered individuals.

C/O: The Daily Sceptic

Dr. Eyal Shahar looked at the Israeli deaths data for all ages and estimated “a plausible range of the booster fatality rate in Israel in August 2021” of 8–17 deaths per 100,000 vaccinees. In the Netherlands, vaccinologist Dr. Theo Schetters estimated a booster fatality rate in the over-60s as high as 125 per 100,000 vaccinees.

As to cause, Dr. Michael Palmer and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi at Doctors for Covid Ethics have set out what they deem “irrefutable proof of causality” that mRNA vaccines are causing vascular and organ damage. From studies and autopsy evidence the medical experts show:

  1. mRNA vaccines don’t stay at the injection site but instead travel throughout the body and accumulate in various organs;
  2. mRNA-based COVID vaccines induce long-lasting expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in many organs;
  3. Vaccine-induced expression of the spike protein induces autoimmune-like inflammation;
  4. Vaccine-induced inflammation can cause grave organ damage, especially in vessels, sometimes with deadly outcome.

They explain that autopsy evidence shows that “the strong expression of spike protein in heart muscle after vaccination correlates with significant inflammation and tissue destruction.” They add that “vaccine-induced vascular damage will promote blood clotting, and clotting-related diseases such as heart attack, stroke, lung embolism are very common in the adverse events databases.”

A recent case report in Vaccines of an autopsy conducted on a 76-year-old man who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID-19 vaccination confirmed the role of the vaccine. It found the presence of spike protein but not the nucleocapsid protein in the deceased man’s brain and heart, proving that the vaccine (which unlike the virus only produces the spike protein) was the cause of the deadly inflammation.

In the heart, signs of chronic cardiomyopathy as well as mild acute lympho-histiocytic myocarditis and vasculitis were present. Although there was no history of COVID-19 for this patient, immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike and nucleocapsid proteins) was performed. Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection. The findings corroborate previous reports of encephalitis and myocarditis caused by gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.

case report of the autopsy of a 55-year-old patient who died four months after receiving a Pfizer jab as a second dose (his first dose was AstraZeneca) made similar findings.

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, but not nucleocapsid protein, was sporadically detected in vessel walls by immunohistochemical assay. The cause of death was determined to be acute myocardial infarction and lymphocytic myocarditis. These findings indicate that myocarditis, as well as thrombo-embolic events following injection of spike-inducing gene-based vaccines, are causally associated with an injurious immunological response to the encoded agent.

A recent meta-analysis claimed to find that the risk of myocarditis is “more than seven fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine”. It claims this supports “the continued use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among all eligible persons per CDC and WHO recommendations.”

However, critics have pointed out the numerous flaws in this meta-analysis and highlighted that it is at odds with a major Nordic study of 23 million people that found the risk of hospitalization post-vaccination in 16–24 year old males was up to 28 times higher than the risk post-COVID. At The Daily Sceptic we have written about this Nordic study as well as a number of other studies with similar findings, including ones from FranceEngland and the U.S. (alongside critiques of studies that purport to show otherwise). A study from Israel confirmed the elevated risk from vaccination, stating: “We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.” A study from Italy found a similar absence of elevated myocarditis during the pre-vaccination pandemic period.

We should also note that vaccination does not prevent COVID infection, so the risks are additive and the comparison between vaccination risk and infection risk is false. Cardiovascular injury also is not the only serious adverse event associated with these vaccines. A recent study by researchers from Harvard, Oxford, and Johns Hopkins University (among others) found that the mRNA vaccines are up to nearly 100 times more likely to cause a person of student age serious injury than prevent him or her from being hospitalized with COVID-19.

Most of these studies only look at clinical adverse events, i.e., events serious enough to warrant medical assistance. Studies are now emerging which show these clinical events to be just the tip of the iceberg of a far larger number of subclinical injuries. A study in Thailand found cardiovascular adverse effects in around a third of teenagers (29.2 percent) following Pfizer vaccination and subclinical heart inflammation in one in 43 (2.3%).

The Swiss study mentioned above was recently highlighted by Dr. Vinay Prasad and comes from the European Society of Cardiology. It confirms the Thai result, finding at least 2.8 percent with subclinical myocarditis (possibly more as the researchers excluded half the cases as possibly from another cause). Prasad observed that this means subclinical myocarditis is hundreds of times (“two orders of magnitude”) more common than clinical myocarditis. The rates were highest in women at 3.7 percent, which is one in 27 vaccinated. (Prasad noted that this is different to the Thai study, which found the usual higher rates in males; he suggested this may be related to how the researchers excluded cases).

C/O: The Daily Sceptic

Crucially, the study found elevated troponin levels – indicating heart injury – across all vaccinated people (see chart above, where the dark lines being shifted to the right of the fainter control group lines implies elevated levels throughout the vaccinated population). This indicates the vaccine is routinely injuring the heart (an organ which does not heal well) and that the known injuries are just the more severe instances of a far larger number occurring right across the board.

These injuries are not necessarily short and over with quickly. Studies have shown that spike protein is still being found in the blood of many vaccinated people at least four months after vaccination, suggesting it is still being produced in some way. The mechanism of this long-term production of spike protein by the body has not been identified (is the genetic code being incorporated into the cell’s DNA?). But if cells in the cardiovascular system and elsewhere are still producing this pathogenic and inflammatory protein for months on end, the risk of auto-immune injury, as identified in the autopsies above, greatly increases. Such an auto-immune injury may be triggered by re-challenge by the virus ramping up the immune response to the spike protein, which may explain why excess non-COVID deaths often accompany COVID waves.

There is now considerable evidence that mRNA vaccines are routinely injuring the heart, with raised troponin levels across the board and subclinical myocarditis in up to one in 27 cases or more. These are not rare events, as is often claimed by medical authorities and in the media. They are alarmingly common.

Understanding SARS-CoV-2’s Obviously Engineered Origins

Harvard to the Big House:

From the co-author of the first peer-reviewed paper examining a laboratory origin for SARS-CoV-2, as well as its addendum, which formally linked the H1N1 Spanish Flu pandemic strain release of 1977 to gain-of-function research.


One of the most striking parts of David Asher’s phone call back in the summer of 2021, even more surprising than offering me and my dad $10,000 to walk away from this work and let Jamie Metzl take ownership of it, was thanking me for getting the original whitepaper me and my dad had written in front of the National Security Council (NSC).

That was actually the first confirmation I had that the contact I had on the NSC had in fact gotten that paper in front of everyone back in the middle of January 2020 when I’d passed it along, shortly before we put it up online on January 31st. 

So back when Tony Fauci and the Zooinati crew was scrambling to cover their tracks in those early weeks, the entire NSC was already completely and entirely aware that SARS-CoV-2 might’ve been engineered because they read our initial whitepaper, Logistical and Technical Exploration into the Origins of the Wuhan Strain of Coronavirusand knew that: 

  • Scientists had been splicing and dicing entire viruses for about 20 years, with Baric’s No See ‘Em technology, pioneered at UNC where scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) had learned how to make coronavirus chimeras several years ago, with technology that would make it nearly impossible to tell if the virus had been manipulated. 
  • Those scientists returned to the WIV, discovered the first SARS-like virus to use ACE2, and were now pretending like their work couldn’t possible have caused the pandemic – even though there’d been years of reporting about all sorts of safety concerns, and the SARS virus had leaked out of Chinese labs several times. 
  • In 2012, scientists had used a technique called “serial passage” to send influenza through multiple sets of ferrets, which closely mimics the natural process of zoonosis and resulted in a virus that suddenly went airborne and became more virulent. 
  • SARS-CoV-2 was already leading to depleted white blood cell counts, had notable homologies with HIV, and was creating troubling neurological symptoms. 

So as that initial paper from way back in January 2020 concluded, and which America’s National Security Council learned, there were only two possibilities:

– A coronavirus spontaneously mutated and jumped to humans at a wet market or deep in some random bat cave which just so happened to be 20 miles from China’s only BSL-4 virology lab, a virus with an unusually slippery never-before-seen genome that’s evading zoological classification, that may be as much as twenty-times more contagious than SARS and whose spike-protein region which allows it to enter host cells holds an unique HIV-like signature with the concomitant clinical response, that somehow managed to infect its patient zero who had no connection to this market, and then be so fined-tuned to humans that it’s gone on to create the single greatest public health crisis in Chinese history with approaching 100 million citizens locked-down or quarantined – also causing Mongolia to close its border with its largest trading partner for the first time in modern history and Russia to ban Chinese citizens from entry into their country.

– Or, Chinese scientists failed to follow correct sanitation protocols possibly while in a rush leading up to an international virological conference and during their boisterous holiday season, something that had been anticipated since the opening of the BSL-4 lab and has happened at least four times previously, and accidentally released this bio-engineered Wuhan Strain – likely created by scientists researching immunotherapy regimes against bat coronaviruses, who’ve already demonstrated the ability to perform every step necessary to bio-engineer the Wuhan Strain COVID-19 – into their population, and now the world. As would be expected, this virus appears to have been bio-engineered at the spike-protein genes which was already done at UNC to make an extraordinarily virulent coronavirus. Chinese efforts to prevent the full story about what’s going on from getting out are because they want the scales to be even since they’re now facing a severe pandemic and depopulation event. No facts point against this conclusion.

The Count of Monte Cristo

However Tony Fauci had a job to do, covering all of this up just like he did with the origins of HIV, so in that flurry of phone calls and emails, the absolutely absurd Proximal Origins paper was cobbled together with lies and misdirection, and published on March 17, 2020. In light of the research done to write our initial whitepaper, this was really obviously a bunch of happy horseshit cooked-up to cover-up what was really going on, so just two days later I wrote a response that highlighted China’s long history influencing scientific publications, and then dissembled all of Andersen’s sophomoric science:

  • SARS-CoV-2’s high binding affinity for ACE2 was the result of “natural” selection, but not in the wild as their paper implied: It screamed of serial passage, the same technique used with highly-pathogenic avian influenza back in 2012 that led to a temporary ban on gain-of-function research. Ferrets could provide the “human-like ACE2” that was being hinted at in their paper, so although forcing this to occur in a lab created a virus that looked almost entirely natural, of course serial passage is in fact “purposeful manipulation” even though the virus itself doesn’t seem to have been changed by an unnatural process, since the natural process is accelerated inside a lab. 
  • Andersen directly argued that the consequences of the FCS would be unknown and its origins always a mystery, when dozens of papers highlighted the incredibly virulent effects of an FCS on most viruses, and its emergence during serial passage experiments back in 2012 was one of virology’s watershed moments. 
  • And probably the most telling and direct lie: “Subsequent generation of a polybasic cleavage site [FCS] would have then required repeated passage in cell culture or animals with ACE2 receptors similar to those of humans, but such work has also not previously been described.” As if the serial passage experiments from 2012 with ferrets and influenza, which led to the emergence of an FCS and an airborne highly-pathogenic flu virus that could infect humans, had never happened at all. 

Serial passage is the single most important lynchpin tying the origins of this virus together, it’s one of the hallmarks of creating a live-attenuated vaccine, and historically has almost always used lab ferrets – an overlapping species with the farmed mink that SARS-CoV-2 hopped right into and was vigorously slaughtering across multiple continents. It was immediately able to jump into farmed mink all across the planet because the virus was returning to a very close cousin of its original host, lab ferrets, which it’d recently been passaged through to attenuate it down, weakening it down into a live-attenuated vaccine instead of a virulent virus. 

Which is probably why Tony Fauci was emailing about “serial passage” back in February 2020, pretty strange no one at all has questioned him or anyone else about this technique in the press? 

But since that takedown of the Proximal Origins paper was pretty wonky, a few days later on March 23rd 2020, I wrote up an article that used The Expanse as a touchstone to understand what was going on, and how serial passage closely mimics a natural process: 

  • The history of manipulated viruses getting out and killing goes back to at least 1977, when an unnatural strain of H1N1 emerged and spread across the globe. And although there wasn’t a consensus on its exact origins, I found an old Soviet paper that demonstrated it’d been manipulated in the lab, showing genetic alterations that only could’ve happened due to serial passage during that era. 
  • This 1977 pandemic occurred in the midst of vaccine work on influenza all across the globe, and now in recent years gain-of-function vaccine work had been ongoing both for pancoronavirus vaccines as well as against HIV, both of which presented viable avenues for SARS-CoV-2’s creation.
  • Peter Daszak was openly lying about the work that’d been done at the WIV, and Ralph Baric was at best dissembling about the implications of what he’d done at UNC. 
  • Almost none of the villagers near batcaves in rural China showed antibodies for SARS-like viruses, so if the people close to bats weren’t contracting their diseases, how did zoonosis – a process that requires extensive interactions with a new host as the virus goes through the trial-and-error of selection – happen in the middle of urban Wuhan? 
Dan being visited by his father, Dr. Karl Sirotkin, during his 1,300 days of incarceration.

And yet after extensive submissions to the popular press, nothing was getting through. Neither did submissions to pretty much every peer-reviewed scientific publication run out of America, so I went across the pond, and in April 2020 submitted a paper to BioEssays, that they’d publish back in August 2020, Might SARS-CoV-2 Have Arisen via Serial Passage through an Animal Host or Cell Culture? 

This was a technical retelling of everything I’d written up to that point, and with my dad’s help to get the finer points right, I managed to outline the long history of superpowers lying about their leaky laboratories, and tie the recent push for pancoronavirus and HIV vaccines to the genesis of our ongoing pandemic. Peer review was supposed to the litmus for scientific discourse, and so as an ex-con I figured this was simply the hoop I needed to jump through to be taken seriously. 

But maybe I should’ve paid more attention to the fact that shortly after this peer reviewed paper arguing for a laboratory origin of the pandemic was published in August 2020, that contact I’d used to get our original whitepaper in front of the NSC lost his job with the NSC, and was soundly demoted.

However sure enough, it brought a few more journalists out of the woodwork. William J. Broad with the New York Times had reached out and then ghosted me back in February 2020, and that peer-reviewed article brought out Drew Griffin with CNN, Josh Rogin with The Washington Post, and then Nicholson Baker with New York Magazine. 

None of them would ever publicly acknowledge that our paper existed at all, and would go out of their ways to write their articles about the origins of the pandemic around it – instead platforming pretty idiots with empty smiles, none of whom had gotten anything past peer review regarding the origins of this pandemic. 

Because America is a testament to unbound hedonism, that’s almost entirely consumed with experiencing as much unbridled pleasure as possible in lieu of anything else at all, and either all of these journalists are really that bad at their jobs – or they’re simply hiding the origins of this pandemic because that’s precisely what they’re being paid to do. Looking back I can’t say for sure that I wouldn’t have done anything differently, but knowing what I do now – I can at least rest easy, knowing it wouldn’t have mattered at all. 

None of the contacts me and my dad made during these nearly three years has lifted a finger as all the work we did was ripped out from under us, and the nature of this virus was downplayed into a mild nothing, a pandemic that Joe Biden tells us is already over. 

But at least passing peer review brought the Deep State entirely out of the woodwork, as a former Secretary of the Navy, who’d recently written whitepapers about collaborating as much as possible with China alongside our sitting Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines, reached out to try and get our paper retracted. That led to the peer-reviewed clarification that came out in February 2021, that added the footnote to the Soviet paper mentioned above, and further highlighted the importance of serial passage in the genesis of our friendly neighborhood coronavirus. 

At this point it became clear that DRASTIC was simply a Limited Hangout being run to distract from the truth we’d been trying to reveal since January 2020, and everyone involved was either intentionally hiding the truth or just really fucking stupid and arrogant – so I made sure it was clear Golden Silkworms in Pandora’s Box was an independent production. 

It’s long and fairly technically though, so a few months later in the spring of 2021, I wrote an article that used one of the oldest and ubiquitous stories we know, the Ten Plagues of Egypt, to explain how and why the quasispecies model does what it does as an embodiment of the Angel of Death. This was followed by another shorter piece summarizing why using the quasispecies model makes it so incredibly obvious that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered in a lab: 

  • When the live-attenuated vaccine for polio, OPV, reverts back to virulence it goes through a series of mutations with a specific pattern, known as “gatekeeping” mutations. These mutations are exquisitely convergent and seem to take shortcuts that natural evolution doesn’t, something that was ignored with SARS-CoV-2 until very late in 2022 when all of a sudden the rest of the world woke up to the convergence that’d been ongoing from the start. Also in OPV, these gatekeeping mutations have only been observed inside Petri dishes or human hosts, whereas with SARS-CoV-2 the same sets of gatekeeping mutations were emerging simultaneous within ferrets and lab mice, as well as us humans, emphasizing that what’s being witnessed isn’t natural evolution, but a live-attenuated vaccine working its way back to its original form like thousands of flecks of T-1000 mercury reassembling back into the Terminator. A natural virus wouldn’t exhibit the same sets of mutations in three totally different sets of hosts, the fact it was happening with SARS-CoV-2 was the slam-dunk for a gatekeeping deattenuating live-attenuated vaccine.

Then a few months later, I’d finally solve the riddle of the FCS, and explain that much like a literary grinning feline – some things are there without seeming to be there at all. A conclusion that made the link back to the 2012 serial passage experiments with ferrets and influenza even more telling.

And finally, for the one-year anniversary of Golden Silkworms, I published an epilogue that confirmed everyone on the planet is heading down a very dark, but well-trodden path, due to the unbound genetic experimentations of morally bankrupt monsters like Joseph Mengele, Bill Gates, Tony Fauci, Alina Chan, Ralph Baric, and Richard Ebright.

All of whom have had countless features and interviews in the mainstream media, while the truth me and my dad uncovered all the way back in January 2020 gets buried. And so without anyone at all interested in helping, since no one can even be bothered to make a Twitter thread about the nearly three years of writing I’ve done – Don’t expect any more clarifications. 

 Me and my dad risked our lives to expose the truth the moment all of this started, and absolutely no one has exhibited the smallest shred of ethics as all the credit for what we’ve done was stolen out from under us.  For whatever reason, a recent preprint about a lab origin can make a massive splash and draw incredible amounts of press, as even its authors pretend like there isn’t a body of peer reviewed literature around a lab origin that exists already, and all of this hasn’t been very thoroughly explained for 18 months and counting. 

Not one single citation of our two peer-reviewed papers, not one mention of “serial passage,” just three more assholes who want to hear themselves talk. 

The time for niceties and etiquette ended millions of innocent deaths ago.

So the bad news is: The scientific community is a death cult, America’s academics, journalists, and politicians are completely and entirely ethically bankrupt – and billions more are going to die before anything changes.


Economic Prism:

Are You Ready for the Coming U.S. Government Default?

Posted on November 4, 2022 by MN Gordon

The vast herd of investors are a deluded crowd.  Following the Federal Reserve’s much anticipated 75 basis point rate hike on Wednesday the major stock market indexes jumped upward.

Optimistic investors keyed in on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement and, in particular, the remark that the Fed, “will take into account the cumulative tightening of monetary policy, the lags with which monetary policy affects economic activity and inflation and economic and financial developments.”

Somehow this was perceived as being the precursor to a policy pivot.  Yet during the post-FOMC statement press conference, Powell clarified that, “It’s very premature to be thinking about pausing.”

Stocks then fell off a cliff.  The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) closing out the day with a loss of 505 points.

Will there be a pivot, pause, or no pivot?  This is the wrong question to be asking.  The reality is the major stock market indexes have much farther to fall before the bear market is over, regardless of if the Fed pivots anytime soon.

If you recall, the Fed began cutting interest rates in September of 2007.  Yet the stock market didn’t bottom out until March of 2009.  Similarly, the Fed began cutting interest rates in January of 2001.  Still, the stock market didn’t bottom out until October of 2002.

Thus, using these two most recent bear markets as a guide, once the Fed finally begins cutting interest rates, which would come after inflation has begun to abate and a period of interest rate pause, the stock market will continue to fall for another 18 to 22 months.

In other words, this bear market may not bottom out until well into 2025.  What’s more, the entire dollar based financial system will likely blow up sometime beforehand.

How’s that for a grim outlook?

Investors, as you can see, are incredibly twisted up by the Fed’s money games, and how they’ve enhanced the peaks and valleys of the stock market.  As for workers and voters, many don’t have a clue as to the ramifications for the real, Main Street economy.  Here’s why…

No Clue

Fiscal policy, as opposed to monetary policy, is more readily understood by workers and voters.  Income taxes, budget deficits, the national debt.  These are all real things the average person of moderate means and mental capacity can grasp a hold of, should they care to.

The effects of zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) or quantitative easing (QE), however, are less apparent to the casual observer.  Politicians may make superficial remarks about consumer price inflation if they think it will score points with voters.  But actual currency debasement policies are rarely mentioned.

Certainly, workers experience the wild booms and busts of central bank caused price distortions.  Still, few ever trace the genesis back to the Federal Reserve.  Instead, they see what appear to be extreme price increases and place the blame on producers.

For example, workers may falsely condemn capitalism for rising prices, especially when provoked by populist politicians.  Yet they never scratch below the surface where the Fed’s money and credit games are lurking.  If they did, they’d find a system that stacks the deck against them.

Take the industrious wage earner.  As he goes about his day-to-day business, he may find that, despite working harder and harder, his lot in life never improves.  In fact, it may even regress.

But many won’t recognize heavy handed monetary policy as reasons for their disappointment.  The erosion of purchasing power can be subtle over long periods.  Moreover, the effects of currency debasement policies extend to all corners of the economy.

Take the recent college graduate, making a subsistence wage at a franchise coffee shop, buried under $50,000 in student loan debt.  He may be deeply aware that something is radically wrong.  He may even ask, ‘How come the cost of school is at such disparity with the value it provides?’

Nonetheless, many college graduates won’t correlate the bubble in student loan debt, or the massive building boom on college campuses, to the Fed’s mass credit creation machine.  Nor will they contemplate the broken promises that led them down such a futile path.  Rather, they look to the President, like an ancient Egyptian pharaoh, to cancel their debts.

Gimme My Stimmy

Similarly, voters may celebrate a new stimmy check, while disparaging greedy capitalists for making their daily cup of coffee so expensive.  Some will even use their free government money to buy a “GIMME MY STIMMY” T-Shirt.  Yet few will bother to ask, ‘Where’s the money coming from?’

The answer, of course, is as hollow as it sounds.  That is, it’s created out of thin air.

Still, the majority of Americans are incapable of putting two and two together.  In fact, this week spectacular evidence was given proving that the majority of Americans are, indeed, mildly retarded.

What are we talking about?

The following Newsweek headlines will leave you questioning the enlightenment of democratic rule…

“Majority of Americans Back New Stimulus Checks To Combat Inflation”

The Fed’s ruse, no doubt, works exceedingly well when consumer prices are suppressed over a multi-decade experiment in globalization and increasing international trade.  The Fed can get away with debasing the currency to juice financial markets and finance bloated government spending programs when cheap, imported goods fill the shelves of Costco and Walmart.  Workers are none the wiser.

But after flooding the economy with upwards of $5 trillion to combat the effects of despotic coronavirus lockdowns, the Fed has produced a problem that won’t simply go away.  The money is out and about, chasing prices higher.  But the majority of Americans want more stimmy checks to somehow combat this.

At the same time, a geopolitical shift is reversing the 50-year trend in globalization.  This structural change in the economy will propel prices higher for decades to come.  Hiking interest rates several percentage points won’t cut it.

Obviously, one can’t assign all liability for the broad population’s financial malaise to the Fed.  Lethargy and sloth remain principal culprits for many folks’ immobility.

Poverty, remember, for a majority of people that live with it, is more of an attitude than a financial condition.  Giving someone free money does nothing to adjust their attitude of poverty.  To the contrary, it reinforces their dependence.

We’ve seen how industriousness and ingenuity can still overcome ZIRP.  Though for wage earners this is an increasingly difficult task.  What good is a 3 percent pay raise when the official rate of consumer price inflation is 8 percent, and the real inflation rate is over 16 percent?

Are You Ready for the Coming U.S. Government Default?

The point is, more than anyone else, Fed Chair Jay Powell has his fingerprints all over today’s raging consumer price inflation and the now destructive rate hiking means for containing it.  The Fed’s efforts to smooth out the peaks and valleys of the business cycle and keep the gravy flowing to its private member banks have had the ill effect of magnifying them.

The consequences to workers, savers, and retirees alike are remarkably harmful.  Furthermore, as the current financial order strains to preserve the status quo, the level of intervention into the economy and financial markets will continue to mushroom like mold spores on wet drywall.  Radical policies will be hatched to cover the shortcomings of prior blunders.

The U.S. national debt has topped $31.2 trillion.  Tack on the debt of households, businesses, state and local governments, and financial institutions, and you’re looking at a total U.S. debt over $92.9 trillion.

As the Fed hikes interest rates to contain the raging inflation of its making, the cost of servicing government debt increases.  Total U.S. tax revenue is approximately $4.9 trillion.  Total U.S. interest paid is over $3.4 trillion.  Before long it will take 100 percent of tax revenue just to service the debt interest.

Then what?

The popular American myth is that the U.S. government has never defaulted on its debt.  Quite frankly, that’s an unadulterated lie.  The U.S. government has (unofficially) defaulted on its debt twice within the last hundred years.

Executive Order 6102 of 1933, which forced all American citizens to turn in gold coins and bars, was, in fact, a default.  Gold ownership in the United States, with some small limitations, was illegal for the next 40 years.

Under EO 6102, Americans were compensated $20.67 per troy ounce of gold.  They were paid with paper dollars.  Immediately following the government’s gold confiscation, the price of gold was raised by the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 to $35 per ounce.  Just like that, American citizens were robbed of over 40 percent of their wealth.

The second default occurred in 1971, when President Nixon “temporarily” suspended the convertibility of the dollar into gold.

Prior to 1971, as determined by the Bretton Woods international monetary system, which was agreed to in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, in July 1944, a foreign bank could exchange $35 with the U.S. Treasury for one troy ounce of gold.  After the U.S. reneged on this established exchange rate, when foreign banks handed the U.S. Treasury $35, they received $35 in exchange.

In both instances, the U.S. government didn’t overtly default on the debt.  Instead, it changed the fundamentals – the terms and conditions – of the dollar.  By all honest accounts, these are defaults.

What dirty trick does Uncle Sam have up his dirty sleeve this time?

One possible swindle is the issuance of a digital dollar – a Fed or government issued central bank digital currency (CBDC) – which is traceable and programmable.  When it is introduced, your accounts will be credited one for one, as in one federal reserve note for one digital dollar.  But what you’ll be able to buy in return with your digital dollars will be far less.

You see, the digital dollar roll out will provide elaborate cover.

Make no mistake.  This is a default.  And it is coming much sooner than you think.

Are you ready?

Liz Truss: “It’s Done”


Liz Truss May Have A New Problem: Did Russia Hack Her Phone?

A report by the United Kingdom’s Daily Mail On Sunday newspaper claimed that former Foreign Secretary and Prime Minister Liz Truss’ private cell phone was hacked by foreign agents “suspected of working for the Kremlin” and that the hack was discovered during the Conservative Party leadership campaign that took place through the summer. 

According to the newspaper, foreign agents were able to intercept messages sent by the soon-to-be prime minister about the war in Ukraine. Private messages between her and former Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng were also allegedly intercepted. 

While the British government has not officially confirmed the hack, the chair of the British government’s Defense Select Committee Tobias Ellwood told British media on Sunday that Russia is “getting better and better” at hacking and cyber-attacks.

“We take the most stringent measures to make sure it doesn’t happen,” Ellwood told Sky News, adding that an investigation by the intelligence and security committee is being prepared. 

It should be noted 19FortyFive cannot verify the claims in the Daily Mail at present.

“It’s Done”

Among the most serious claims following the reported hack came from Kim Dotcom (which we also cannot confirm), the German-Finnish entrepreneur and activist who founded Megaupload, an online file hosting service that was shut down by the U.S. government following accusations of criminal copyright infringements, wire fraud, and money laundering. 

In a tweet published on Sunday, Dotcom claimed that the Russians know the British government had a hand in the Nord Stream explosions because of a message sent by Truss from her personal iPhone to U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

“How do the Russians know that the UK blew up the North Stream pipelines in partnership with the US? Because @trussliz used her iPhone to send a message to @SecBlinken saying ‘It’s done’ a minute after the pipeline blew up and before anybody else knew?” Dotcom wrote, adding, “iCloud access rocks!”

iCloud is an online service used by iPhone and Apple Mac users that allows messages, files, photographs, and contacts to be saved online and accessed by authorized computers and devices.

Dotcom added that China and Russia have “sophisticated cyber units” that allow them to gain backdoor access to Big Tech databases, suggesting that users’ data may not be as secure as they think.

“The funny thing is Govt officials with top security clearance still prefer using iPhones over their NSA & GCHQ issued encrypted sh*t-phones,” Dotcom added.

The British government has not confirmed Dotcom’s claims, nor has Russia explicitly stated that the text message exists or was intercepted by hackers.

19FortyFive cannot independently verify Dotcom’s claims.

Jack Buckby is a British author, counter-extremism researcher, and journalist based in New York. Reporting on the U.K., Europe, and the U.S., he works to analyze and understand left-wing and right-wing radicalization, and reports on Western governments’ approaches to the pressing issues of today. His books and research papers explore these themes and propose pragmatic solutions to our increasingly polarized society.

CoVid – Lab Origin and mRNA Killer

Quoth the Raven:

Senate Report Concludes Covid Came From “Research Related Incident”

“…the hypothesis of a natural zoonotic origin no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt, or the presumption of accuracy.”

It’s the moment we all knew was coming.

A Senate Committee on Health Education, Labor and Pensions Minority Oversight Staff interim report from October 27, 2022 titled “An Analysis of the Origins of the COVID19 Pandemic” has revealed that the origins of Covid were more likely based in a lab as part of a “research related incident” and not zoonotic.

The report was the result of a “bipartisan Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee oversight effort into the origins of SARS-CoV-2”. It provides a lengthy analysis that reviews “publicly available, open-source information to examine the two prevailing theories of origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus”.

Among other conclusions, the report notes: “While precedent of previous outbreaks of human infections from contact with animals favors the hypothesis that a natural zoonotic spillover is responsible for the origin of SARS-CoV-2, the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 that resulted in the COVID-19 pandemic was most likely the result of a research-related incident.

In other words, all of us “conspiracy theorists” floating the idea of a lab leak just because of the totally coincidental fact that the virus showed up on a virology lab’s doorstep, have now been validated by the U.S. Senate.

In a section titled “Problems with the Natural Zoonotic Hypothesis”, the report says:

“Based on precedent and genomics, the most likely scenario for a zoonotic origin of the COVID-19 pandemic is that SARS-CoV-2 crossed over the species barrier from an intermediate host to humans. However, the available evidence is also consistent, perhaps more so, with a direct bat-to-human spillover. Both scenarios remain plausible and, in the absence of additional information, should be considered equally valid hypotheses.

However, nearly three years after the COVID-19 pandemic began, critical evidence that would prove that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and resulting COVID-19 pandemic was caused by a natural zoonotic spillover is missing.”

Then, in the report’s conclusion, it states:

“Based on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident. New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment. However, the hypothesis of a natural zoonotic origin no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt, or the presumption of accuracy.

The report was signed off on by Richard Burr, United States Senator and Ranking Member, U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Regarding the report’s research process, Burr wrote:

“Over the last fifteen months, HELP Committee Minority oversight staff carefully reviewed several hundred publicly available scientific studies, interviewed several dozen subject matter experts, and analyzed previous reports and studies on the possible origins of the virus. I believe that this report provides a significant contribution to the existing body of evidence and helps establish parameters for how future analyses should be reviewed.”

And for the icing on the cake, just weeks ago Taiwan also concluded that the virus likely did not come from the Wuhan wet markets. The country’s Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) said in late September, in a revelation that went mostly unnoticed by the mainstream media, that “it does not believe the wet market to be the source of the COVID pandemic and suggested that a leak from a laboratory in Wuhan is a possibility.”

Wuhan’s now-infamous wet market

“Our speculation is we think the Wuhan Huanan wet market is not the origin. [The market is] probably just a very important step in the transmission chain. The origin is somewhere else,” said Philip Lo, deputy head of the CECC’s medical response division, Taiwan News reported.

“Maybe it’s still in Wuhan, for example, the laboratory…we don’t have proof, solid evidence,” Lo continued.

This news should come as no surprise to anyone who has been reading Fringe Finance. Back in early September I published the thoughts of Harvard PhD and Rutgers professor Dr. Richard Ebright, who said Covid was “much more easily explained” by a lab leak.

Covid “Much More Easily Explained” By Lab Leak: Harvard PhD & Rutgers Chem Professor

Over the weekend, Dr. Richard Ebright of Rutgers University laid out what I can only describe as a damning chronology of circumstantial evidence supporting the case for Covid-19 emerging from a lab in Wuhan, instead of via natural origins. Dr. Richard Ebright is the Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University and…

Read more

Upon reviewing the thread laid out by Ebright, Justin B. Kinney, an Associate Professor at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory and Princeton PhD commented that the thread was “much more compelling” than the evidence recently published by Worobey et al. and Pekar et al. in Science,” referring to a July 2022 study that concluded the virus came from the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market (and was riddled, in my opinion, with conflicts of interest and ties to the CDC and WHO).

“This evidence is not dispositive, but were the lab leak hypothesis incorrect, it would represent a staggering set of coincidences,” Kinney wrote back in September.

Between this revelation and Elon Musk taking over Twitter, a lot apologies are going to be in order over the next few days. You can read the new Senate report for yourself here.


OK, so we know now what we knew then — it was a lab screwup.

So what about the mRNA gene treatments (aka “vaccine”)?

Here is Larry Johnson:

So here is the question and Matt’s great answer:

While the timing of vax and spikes is indicative  does anyone have the data as to causes of death to be specific as to why the spikes ?  Is it vax or is it coincident to spikes in new covid strains? Were all the excess deaths vaxxed? If so what was cause of death?  I have no view on this, just like to see the specific data to know a specific answer and not assume a correlation. I learned that specifics are needed in stat class at Wharton

Matt’s response:

I didn’t go to Wharton, so I can’t speak to their statistics curriculum. But when I went from the Long Island School for the Gifted (elementary school) into a Catholic prep school, it took about two weeks for some confused and very frustrated nuns to put me into “Special Ed” class. A class which I shared for a year with 3 other “students”, one of which communicated by chewing on a bell attached to his wheelchair. It was in that class that I learned that I had to train my brain to stop multitasking, slow down and speak linearly when communicating with others, or else they will (rightly) assume that I am retarded.

So from the top. 

We knew within the first two months of the pandemic being declared that the spike protein was cytotoxic, meaning it kills mammalian cells that it comes into contact with en vivo. In fact, SARS-Cov2 the virus itself, aside from the spike protein on its exterior was virtually inert and harmless. The disease we know as COVID-19 and all its corresponding symptoms resulting from infection and viral replication of SARS-Cov2, is caused in its entirety from the spike protein. Spike causes the symptoms, Spike causes the damage. But like all other viral infections, its severity was based on viral load and its duration was days to weeks, depending on how fast a persons T macrophage cells got on top of it.

T macrophage cells are the immune cells that go around and eat infected or cancerous cells or any cell not doing its job. Those T-mac cells then excrete tiny bits of virus, protien chains and amino acids that are not native to the body, as waste. Those foreign protein chains (virus bits) are what’s called antibodies and they are hoovered up by a different kind of T cell commonly refered to as Memory T-cells. Their job is to Imprint those unique virus bits, so that if they are ever encountered again in the future, the body immediately rallies an army of T Macrophages and sends them to the site where the detection happened and they kill everything. AKA a cytokine storm.  

So with that context in mind.

SARS-Cov2 Is made up of some 70 odd unique protein sequences one of which is spike, and each sequence made up of even more unique amino acid chains. So throughout the 70 year history of vaccineology, the standard process has always been to find a unique viral protein that is completely harmless and non toxic, replicate it by the trillions and attach them to inert or dead OLD virus, something harmless that only affects donkeys for instance. Hence the term Retro-Virus vaccine. But this time was different. This time, the protein that they picked out of the 70 possible, was the spike. They chose the only viral protein that was known to be cytotoxic at the time. Why? Who fucking knows, but after 70 years of making vaccines using non-cytotoxic protiens, I’d really like to know. 

So this MRNA vaccine operated differently, It is more akin to a gene therapy than a vaccine because it doesn’t train your immune cells on dummy viruses, It re-writes the DNA of your Memory T-cells and T macrophage cells, and turns them into spike factories. So now rather than getting covid and having an ever decreasing amount of spike doing damage as your T cells kill the infection, you have your entire immune systems cells cranking out spike 24/7 until they litterally explode. But often they get to reproduce beforehand so there are new zombie T-cells cranking out spike because MRNA is a gene therapy not a vaccine. Its not just inter-generational in regards to your T-cells, Its inter-generational period.

So I’ve been against the vaccine from the beginning, but I am not the one crunching the data obviously. I can direct you to the people that are. 

Here is Naomi Wolf’s publication–she’s had 1300 data scientists volunteer to analyze the 80k+ pages of Pfizer saftey trial data that the federal judge ordered released. Her team has been cranking out amazing papers on the data as it comes in, the court order allowed Pfizer to break it up into 4 data dumps over 9 months, so they’ve been able to get information out to the public within weeks of each new dump. Nov 1st is the last data dump so everything you’ll see there is literally breaking news because it is research on data never seen by anyone other than Pfizer and the scumbags at the FDA.

Naomi is no slouch either. Dr. Naomi Wolf is a 2x international bestselling author, NYT columnist, and professor; she is a graduate of Yale University and received a doctorate from Oxford.

Next is Steve Kirsch, current VC and former high tech serial entrepreneur, inventor of the optical mouse and an engineer with two degrees from MIT. He is double vaxxed an injured from it which made him and 4 other MIT engineering alums start analyzing the VAERS data. Which isn’t the best considering the Harvard study commissioned by the FDA on the effectiveness of its VAERS system showed VAERS captured a hair over 1% of the actual adverse events data, Harvard concluded the study with recommendations on how to fix the system, but the FDA and its Pharma paymasters didn’t think that was a good idea so the FDA declined. With that in mind, Steve and his shitty VAERS data is showing a rate of 26 permanently injured and 7 dead for every 100 MRNA shots. 

“The CDC claims VAERS is simply over reported, but cites no evidence. The evidence shows that VAERS is under reported by 5.4X. For example, the VAERS data shows that acute cardiac failure is elevated in the COVID vaccines by 475X compared to other vaccines. Once we correct using the 5.4X factor, we get a 2,565X higher fatality rate for these vaccines. How could that be “safe”? Nobody will explain that.”

Steve now has released hundreds of articles and papers on his and others analysis, which can be found here.

Jessica Rose has a PhD in data science from Harvard and she’s been doing the analysis on the Israeli, DOD and Moderna data. She is an all around good person, very funny but with an extremely annoying laugh. Her papers, most of which have now been peer reviewed for whatever thats worth now adays, and articles she published going over her analysis can be found here.

And With that ladies and gentleman, I’ve exhausted my brain’s ability to stay on a singular train of thought. So I hope this supplemental information will be helpful in your conversations and capital allocations. I’d like to end with the question–what would a country with 4% of its workforce soon to be or already disabled, look like? What are the 2nd and 3rd order effects of something like that?

Bow to the Emperor Without Clothes?

The Sakr:

Giorgia’s Tragedy: On Italy Going Polish

October 23, 2022

by Jo Red for the Saker blog

The Drama of Italian Politics

Frodo is indeed the most tragic character in the Lord of the Rings. He belongs to the shire and goodness. Yet he’s also got curiosity and adventurousness that are unusual for Hobbits, even if still not enough to subvert his life. Finally, the occasion comes, and the harmony is broken: Frodo must bear the burden of the ring straight through the desolation of Mordor.

Giorgia Meloni knows the story by heart. She even used to dress up as a Hobbit and write fiction inspired by the LotR. The summer schools of the right-wing youth movement she belonged to and led for a time were called “Hobbit camps”. The older generations of MSI leaders, more inspired by Julius Evola and even outright Fascism, frowned on such divertissements. They didn’t consider them serious enough for their mission. Yet Giorgia and the others in the new generation must have perceived that the Middle Earth is much more dramatic than most non-fiction. Tolkien was an orphan, raised by a priest: a conservative Catholic, he fought at the bloody Somme front in WWI and fathered four sons, among whom another Catholic priest. He was certainly a spiritual and serious person, as it transpires from the work he put his soul and legacy into, and openly devoted to the Holy Virgin. No fairy tale, the LtR conveys the cosmic and psychological features of the battle between good and evil. It stresses the nuances and ambiguities of the frontiers between them while emphasizing the need for watchfulness and militancy. In the era of the draught of principles, spirit, and values, Giorgia was obviously receptive to such messages, as were countless others in her generation.

Like the LotR, Italian politics is no comforting fairy tale since at least the times of Machiavelli. Rino Formica, a prominent member of the Italian Socialist Party, provided an icastic, curt definition of politics as “blood and shit”. Once at the center of the formidable Roman Empire, Italy has since been the lot for the powerhouses of the moment, often more than one at a time. Internally fragmented, and internationally divided, its boundless pride collides with the paradox of being an object of both contempt and envy, and produces immense frustration and countless dissonances within itself and for its external observers. Perhaps nothing expresses it better than the magnificent irrelevance, the burgeoning decadence of Rome and the Vatican. Prone to believe all the “conspiracy theories” history is made of, as they have been involved in most one way or another, Italians retain nonetheless a distinct, Catholic sense for an almost liturgical public façade. These attritions have of course given way to many sparks and some explosions: the hegemonic wars of European powers on Italian soil in the XVI century – Henry Camen’s “Iron Century”; the unification civil war that is remembered as the Risorgimento, and historian Denis Mack Smith more soberly described as “nothing but an episode of the British Empire”; then the ambivalent explosion in WWI; the humiliation of the Versailles Treaty that dealt with Italy as if it were a loser despite its having sided with the winners – a sort of double betrayal; Fascism and colonialism; the univocal explosion of WWII; defeat, irrelevance, and 80 years of occupation and domination by the Anglos with occasional intermittences as a Great Power.

The last of such moments of clarity manifested in these very days, about 40 years ago.

Greetings from a Sunny Colony

In the early morning of October 11, 1985, quite a show went on at the Naval Air Station of Sigonella, Sicily. Three circles of military, Italian, American, and again Italian, surrounded each other and pointed guns.

Two men from a radical branch of the Palestinian Liberation Organization had hijacked the Italian Achille Lauro ship and cruelly murdered an innocent Jewish-American passenger, Leon Klinghoffer. After having been permitted to reach Egypt by negotiators who were unaware of their crime while onboard, they tried to escape to Tunisia, the then seat of the PLO, but their plane had been intercepted by American Tomcats.

It is at this point that Americans directed the plane toward their closest military basis. The Italians, however, had been alerted and instructed to seize the hijackers, as the two men had perpetrated their crimes on Italian territory, and PM Bettino Craxi intended to take control over the issue despite American encroachments. When the Americans tried to sneak into the part of the basis they directly controlled, the first circle of Italian Aerial Military Vigilance surrounded them, only to be surrounded in turn by a Delta Force commando. But from the base, a larger brigade of Carabinieri, Italy’s military police, once again encircled the Delta. The standoff was tense, and the American diplomats and politicians eventually understood that Italy for once was determined to be treated with dignity. Finally, someone told to shut up to Michael Ledeen, the Neocon warmonger who had studied in Rome, was hanging around without the semblance of any officiality among the Reagan administration, and insisted to hold the talks with Italy’s PM, which of course infuriated Craxi. Nowadays, Ledeen is more known for his criminal and bullish “doctrine” recommending the US executes some defenseless Third World country on the world stage, every ten years or so, as a display of its “greatness”.

Anyway, just as furious was Ronald Reagan, who didn’t want to interact with Craxi directly. While I’m no admirer of Craxi, the man had his qualities. Corrupt and famous for sleeping with all the appealing actresses of public and private TV, including the first ones employed in adult shows, Craxi was also stubbornly nationalistic. He bragged about Italy’s GDP surpassing the UK’s. He would later save Ghaddafi from the Eldorado Canyon missile strike (Ghaddafi was himself a creature of Italy’s neocolonialism, supposedly vested with his mission at a meeting with Italy’s intelligence at the Abano Terme SPA). He would even burn some clock by endorsing Ben Ali’s succession to Bourguiba in Tunisia, while the French were still sorting out their own candidate.

And even in Sigonella, Craxi had it his way. Reagan had to leave the hijackers in Italian hands, and Italy used them to open channels with the PLO and the Arab world. Most importantly, it did not tolerate the violation of its sovereignty and its rights under international law.

Like Machiavelli’s writings and life, this story of course has no happy ending. Already in 1987, Craxi had to resign as the ultra-orthodox Christian Democrat (and Atlanticist) Ciriaco De Mita pulled the plug on his government. And just the following year, De Mita happily welcomed 72 US Air Force F-16 that had been pushed away by Spain. In the early ‘90s, Craxi was under accusation of corruption amidst Mani Pulite, an investigation that is rumored to have been directed by the CIA. Craxi had to go into exile under Ben Ali’s protection in Hammamet, Tunisia. And there he died in 2000, at the relatively young age of 66. As we know, Ben Ali was later ousted in the wake of the so-called “Arab Spring”. Bottom line: no act of self-respect is tolerated in a colony.

Craxi was an ambiguous, Machiavellian politician. However, I could as well tell the story of the idealistic Enrico Mattei, still famous for his “Mattei’s model” which is approvingly cited by Meloni. Mattei set up Italy’s ENI, the country’s oil and energy giant, on the premise that source countries would be left with 75% of the revenues. Of course, it did not last long. Not because of the Third World partners, who were enthusiastic. But “coincidentally” Mattei was killed in a plane accident in 1962.

And so goes the story of Aldo Moro, the first Christian Democrat leader who tried to approach the pro-Moscow Communist Party and include them in government. Once again “coincidentally”, Moro became also the first Italian PM to be kidnapped and murdered by terrorists on May 9, 1978. His wife recounts that Moro had been contacted by no one else than Henry Kissinger, who told him on the phone his attempts at collaborating with all political forces would provoke “grave consequences”. Unsurprisingly, Kissinger denies the accusation.

Giorgia at Sauron’s Court

To my astonishment, these stories are rarely recalled while drawing perspectives on Italian politics. They are even more unanimously ignored by foreign reporters, of course. With few exceptions: as an Italian, it was a relief to read Pepe Escobar’s analysis of the situation of my country. No longer Bella Vita, really. So, a pro-Russian blog reposts a story that reveals my own country much more deeply than the condescending lectures we get daily from the Anglo-Americans, unashamed to flaunt their ignorance of the basics of Italian society before its very protagonists. I’m thinking about Alan Friedman, Rula Gebreal, and the like, but really, there’s no scarcity of “professionals” to submit incredibly shallow, politically correct, uninformed “reports” as an excuse to eat some real pizza.

Still, I’d add some points to Pepe’s excellent account.

The history I have recalled so far should suffice to realize that no one can fancy any real power in Italy without US permission. In more recent times, Berlusconi tried to act as a Craxi 2.0 in soft mode: he was indeed Craxi’s protegee and one of his admirers. Even nowadays, he talks about the meeting at Pratica di Mare as the true end of the Cold War. Yet when Putin broke with the West, and Berlusconi became an obstacle to removing Ghaddafi, NATO switched the light off in no time. As Pepe says, the President of the Republic, the unelected “monarch” who commands Italy’s army forces, is the de facto guarantor of US and NATO interests in our political system. His 7-year-long mandate has even been extended by the two last ones, and no one complained of violating “democracy”, of course, in their cases. At the time Berlusconi was at the height of his power in Italian politics: he controlled television channels, AC Milan, was the unchallenged leader of a unified center-right party, and very easily crushed any internal dissent (ask Gianfranco Fini and Dino Boffo, whose private life was desecrated by newspapers right after they voiced criticism of Berlusconi). Yet a timid attempt at preserving a minimum of international independence was enough for his undoing. It is said that Salvini too was approaching Putin too closely when his government was brought to an end in the summer of 2019. And it is again an interesting “coincidence” that Biden’s settlement at the White House ushered in Draghi’s government in the place of Trump’s friend “Giuseppi” Conte (despite desperate, shameless attempts by this latter to flatter Biden equally).

So Giorgia would not last a day if she were to take any stance on Ukraine, except for unconditional obedience. Is she feigning? After all, Orbán managed to put to good use even a fellowship from Soros’ Open Society Foundation. But I believe Giorgia is sincere. She is usually consistent, and this played a big part in her being preferred in the vote. She never seemed to take an opportunistic turn in her career: neither when she started from a post-fascist party, nor when she left Berlusconi’s right-wing Leviathan to create a party of her own.

Yet until recently, she defended Russia and Putting’s actions, even concerning Crimea. What is she doing now, then? I believe she has somewhat changed her mind. Like other leaders and ordinary citizens, she could not retain her pro-Russian inclinations in face of the Special Military Operation. These developments were sold unanimously as an aggression by the stronger against the weaker in Italy’s political and cultural sphere, and I think she bought into at least part of the story – which of course I know to be flawed. Her foreign policy coordinatorTerzi Sant’Agata and other Zio-Atlanticists’ company, as Pepe notices, opened many doors, but do not help in this respect. Furthermore, the fear of the Russian bear reawoke anti-Soviet and anti-Communist militancy in many spokespersons of the Italian right. They believe they have resumed siding with the people of Prague, Budapest, and now Kiev, against a materialistic, brutal oppressor. These facilitate their denial of the plain fact that the devastator of values is the Empire of the Collective West, while Russia is defending and preserving them more than any other.

Also, of course, there’s the appeal of power. In her long march from 2 and 4% to the gates of government – more or less like the path toward the Gates of Mordor – Giorgia must have become, more or less consciously, seduced by the lure of the dream coming true. She, the girl from the poor Roman suburb of Garbatella, the daughter of a single mother, the waitress at the Piper club, now becoming the first female PM in the history of Italy!

So, what will happen to her? Like with Frodo, I’m mostly concerned with her person. I have watched countless interviews of hers, including in informal settings – when she was asked about her pregnancy in 2016, for instance. I believe her to be a decent person, or at least not to be as evil and cynical as the average politician. I also believe her to be bright, prudent, and strong-willed. Yet in politics as in life, the distinction good-evil is more complex than in fairy tales and Hollywood movies, as exemplified by the havoc these latter and the simplistic narrative of the “Axis of Evil” brought on the masses worldwide.

As the great Solzhenitsyn has it:

“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?”

The reality – or I should say the tragedy – of politics is much more resemblant to the epic yet shadowy universe of Tolkien. And the battle in Giorgia’s heart has begun already before the election. Torn between “governists” and “movementists”, between appeals to VOX and to Orbán on the one hand, and the institutional responsibility of carrying on Draghi’s iron-cage agreement with the EU on the other, Giorgia has lost some supporters on both sides. Her victory was announced, but she did not triumph, and people are protesting even before she presents her government. Berlusconi and Salvini ask to be influential, and so do their parties, the President imposes his constraints, and so certainly do the US and NATO. Giorgia has been appearing in public less in recent days, and she lamented many sleepless nights. The dream of the clean girl finally sitting on the throne could quite easily turn into a nightmare.

The same people who voted for her are mostly contrary to sanctions, as are the majority of Italians, and many – like me – are even pro-Russian. Her party’s representatives replied that this proves that their stance is principled and not out of political convenience, but of course, this defiance does not solve the serious political contradiction. As the EU revealed that the promises of massive financial support contained in the National Plan for Recovery and Resilience (PNRR) will be kept if and only if the government progresses on the LGBTQ+ agenda they have discretely agreed on with Draghi, Giorgia’s party protested. Yet if they resist this, there will be many other “irresistible offers” and compromises later.

I have voted for them as the anti-system parties, including some Russophiles, were unable to reach the 3% threshold and enter Parliament. This was mostly due to their fragmentation, as together they counted some 5% of the ballots, and to the cunning of Draghi’s government, who scheduled September elections for the first time in history to reduce the time for the opposition to organize. They also held the vote right before the utility bills raise exponentially, which will double the support for pacifists and pro-Russians.

From within the government, Brothers of Italy will exert the highest possible resistance against the corruptive, destructive, enslaving attempts by Anglo-American and EU neoliberal oligarchy at spreading anti-sexual LGBTQ+ propaganda and legislation, marijuana, euthanasia, careless abortions, and their other poisonous policies. As Putin recently recalled, Opium Wars are classic imperialism.

And in terms of foreign policy, Giorgia will side with the EU countries who are forced into a corner by the Franch-German axis. She will also pursue some of her anti-colonial and especially anti-French ideas, as she denounced Paris’s African policy as a major factor in humanitarian disasters, and resisted ignoble attempts at selling out Italy’s sovereignty and resources. The most shameful of these is the treasonous “treaty of Caen” with which former PM Paolo Gentiloni graciously tried to present France with a large portion of Italian sea. In exchange for what? One can only speculate, while Gentiloni has made a stellar career as the EU’s commissioner for economy and finance (thanks to French votes, obviously). Draghi confirmed the homage to Macron, as did his and Gentiloni’s whole faction of politicians, in reverence to their transalpine masters. Still, they did not dare present the “treaty” before the Italian parliament to be approved- as it risked rejection even before Giorgia’s became the main party. In the meanwhile, France is already acting as if it were valid, so to establish a legal base as unchallenged custom…

Meloni has been vocally critical of all this, as she has been of servitude to EU powers in general, of the CFA franc reins on African economies, of the welcoming of desperate migrants as a workforce to be exploited and to substitute for Italy’s declining population – something that is demographically absurd. Yet to have a chance of ruling, she had to compromise one thing, only a little thing, apparently a detail of foreign policy, something every other European state is also doing without even questioning…

Of course, she did not do so in a fully conscious way, or at least that would surprise me. Everyone around her is telling her it’s the right thing to do. Even the Pope condemns Russia’s “aggression” and “blesses” the weapons sent to Ukraine. Salvini and Berlusconi are reluctant, but they profess Atlanticism to avoid the mediatic inquisition and painful dossiers potentially popping out from the rooms of the secret services. So, it seemed only natural to concede… And do what “everyone” (but her voters!) sanctions as “right”.

In personal terms, Giorgia is much more similar to Putin than to her newly found NATO groomers. Grown up in a modest family, abandoned by her father at the age of one – he was later arrested for drug trafficking in Spain – Giorgia fought all her life while preserving her Christian values. She does not exhibit rosaries, icons, and crosses: in this, she differs starkly from Salvini. And while she is not as debauched as Berlusconi, she is no strict nun either. She is not married; her partner is much more liberal than her. Yet she invites representatives of her party to embrace a sober lifestyle. Only a few hours ago, she declared “we are no monsters nor populists: we are realists” at VOX’s convention, where she intervened together with Trump, Orbán and Morawiecki.

This resonates interestingly with Pope Benedict XVI’s (appreciative) assessment of Putin in his book Final Conversations:

“Our meeting (Benedict XVI and Putin’s) was interesting. We spoke in German, and he knows it perfectly. We did not undertake deep discussions, but I believe that he – while a powerful man – is touched by the necessity of faith. He is a realist. He sees that Russia suffers the destruction of morality. Also as a patriot, as a person who wants to bring it back to its role of great power, he understands that the destruction of Christianity threatens to destroy it as well. He is aware that man needs God, and certainly, he is intimately touched by Him. Even now, when he presented Pope Francis with an icon, he first crossed himself and kissed it.”

Meloni and Putin are both believers who do not parade religion – Putin decried requests for a “spiritual streap-tease” – but at the same time, they realize it cannot be dissociated from politics either. Hence their closeness on the territory of morals. A comparison between Giorgia’s trademark speech and the part of Putin’s programmatic speech Andrei judges the most important and radical (the one including the denunciation of Western Satanism) is striking:

Giorgia: “Why is the family an enemy?… Because it is our identity… so they attack national identity, they attack religious identity, they attack gender identity, they attack family identity. I can’t define myself as Italian, Christian, woman, mother. No. I must be citizen x, gender x, parent 1, parent 2. I must be a number. Because when I am only a number, when I no longer have an identity or roots, then I will be the perfect slave at the mercy of financial speculators. The perfect consumer…. We want to defend the value of the human being. Every single human being, because each of us has a unique genetic code that is unrepeatable. And like it or not, that is sacred. We will defend it. We will defend God, country and family… Because we will never be slaves and simple consumers at the mercy of financial speculators… I am Giorgia, I am a woman, I am a mother, I am Italian, I am Christian, you won’t take it from me.” (English translation by Mercatornet).

Putin: “Let me repeat that the dictatorship of the Western elites targets all societies, including the citizens of Western countries themselves. This is a challenge to all. This complete renunciation of what it means to be human, the overthrow of faith and traditional values, and the suppression of freedom are coming to resemble a “religion in reverse” – pure Satanism… Let’s answer some very simple questions for ourselves. Now I would like to return to what I said and want to address also all citizens of the country – not just the colleagues that are in the hall – but all citizens of Russia: do we want to have here, in our country, in Russia, “parent number one, parent number two and parent number three” (they have completely lost it!) instead of mother and father? Do we want our schools to impose on our children, from their earliest days in school, perversions that lead to degradation and extinction? Do we want to drum into their heads the ideas that certain other genders exist along with women and men and to offer them gender reassignment surgery? Is that what we want for our country and our children? This is all unacceptable to us. We have a different future of our own.”

How could two so like-minded people end up not only on opposing sides, but actively waging war against each other? Especially in the deadly political environment created by the Western Empire, where the Resistance, the defenders of such simple truths – men and women… – are persecuted into supporting each other?

People familiar with European politics will immediately notice that this is not the first context where such a question is raised. It is the same situation as Poland. And Meloni is a friend, almost a twin to Poland’s ruling party, even if she held on to pro-Russian positions until the Special Military Operation was launched. The explanations for these paradoxes are simple – in the case of Poland, it is a centuries-long history. But I will sketch some.

First of all, both are artificial conditions that are shaped and directed by the Empire, particularly the US, NATO, and the EU, to divide and rule their opponents. Everyone can understand that if you lose Poland, you also lose the Baltics and, sooner or later, the whole Visegrád 4. So US motivations to keep the centuries-long hatred going are high. In the case of Italy, there is a strong Russophile tradition – reciprocated by a very warm Russian friendship – and once again, a turn toward the Russian sphere would leave the West in worse conditions than during the Cold War (while a Polish conversion would almost mean the reconstitution of the Warsaw pact). As I explained, they literally killed people over decades to avoid such a scenario.

So, the motivation is all there. What are the means? Mostly, an exploitation of misunderstandings. The main divide between Russia and Poland – less so in the case of Italy – is the religious one. But the Catholic-Orthodox confrontation is, I would claim, anachronistic, especially in political terms. No sane Catholic would ask for an act of submission from the Orthodox, nor for them to renounce their jurisdiction. Theological differences are another matter, but do they justify such hatred?

Besides these historical and ideological clashes and very interested and substantial fanning of the fire by the West, the answer is probably that there is no answer beyond habit and convenience: at least, not any that be relatively as strong as to explain such outright contradictions. The conflicts are entirely artificial and absurd.

The West openly despises Giorgia’s and Poland’s convictions. Yet they tolerate them very gladly as long as these perform their role of anti-Russian fanatics. This is unsurprising, as the West is a-moral, even more, and even worse, than immoral. They do not have an opposing morality: the fact is, morality does not exist for them, they have the reverse of morality. They would pay and encourage conservative Catholics, as they did with Isis and the Wahabi Muslims of Saudi Arabia, as long as this serves their craving for power. That’s their only “religion”. As Putin put it: pure Satanism. In fact, New York-based Federico Rampini is openly suggesting to Giorgia: “follow the Polish example”. Italy, like Poland, risks mistaking masochism for courage, and rejoicing under their masters’ lashes for the occasion to “punish Russia”.

Collaborating with such “friends” imposes the burden of several contradictions. In the case of Poland, these are blatant as, despite their troublesome history, the two nations are Slavic brothers. More than one century ago, Rosa Luxemburg wrote her Ph.D. thesis on the economic unsustainability of the divide between Poland and Russia. I would still expect that the Polish had an easier job, as their population is not declining as quickly as Italy, their economy is growing, and they are not burdened by the crippled political system that was imposed on Italy after its defeat in WWII. In fact, reform for a decent version of presidentialism is one of the crucial objectives for Giorgia.

Yet in her case, the three contradictions are the following:

  1. Between Brothers or Italy and their electorate, as I have already mentioned. The Parliamentarian majority is at odds with the majority in the country, as well as in their own electorate, who is against sending weapons to Ukraine. This is the electoral contradiction.
  2. Between Italy’s national interest, that Giorgia declares to be the only compass of her politics, and Atlanticism. Everyone can understand that waiting for LNG to arrive across the Atlantic and supporting the Americans who occupy and despise us instead of the Russians who admire us and would liberate us is a contradiction in convenience and Realpolitik.
  3. More deeply, as I explained, an ideological contradiction, a contradiction of values. There is no way one can make sense of fighting against Brussels’ neoliberal LGBTQ+ climate radicalism while waging war against Russian defenders of Christianity, religion, reason, and common sense.

Here Giorgia’s adventure seems to risk ending in tragedy at the very moment it was ending in triumph. Giorgia carried the ring to be destroyed – the imperial nihilistic oppression she rejects so vocally in her speech. But then she falls victim to its enthrallment at the very moment she decides to use it to realize her dream of leading her country.

In the Christian worldview, there is no axis of evil, but only the original sin that cripples all equally, until we are rescued by virtue and grace. Humans, including Giorgia Meloni, are all fallible, contradictory, and complex, no less than the LotR’s Frodo. The question is, who will be her Gollum, her Sam, and her Gandalf, if any?

Blind Man’s Bluff 2.0: Did Russia Get The Goods On Us Re A Dirty Bomb?

Meaning and History:

This morning Alex Mercouris featured a fascinating summary of the recent spate of actual communication between Russia and the collective West. For at least four months there had been no contacts that we know of, then—call after call, and all at the same time that the topic of a false flag nuclear event in Ukraine was also in the news, based on Russian accusations. Also in the news at that time was word of a severed cable near the Shetland Islands, and only a bit later did we learn that a Russian ship had been in the immediate vicinity. It followed on Zelensky’s demand that, if Russia should use a “nuclear weapon” of any sort, then the West should launch a “preemptive strike” against Russia. As Mercouris pointed out, although a “dirty bomb” isn’t exactly a nuke, it is something like a “nuclear weapon”.

Mercouris also pointed out the curious series of events that set all this off. The Russian Defense Minister, Shoigu, contacted the UK MoD Wallace, whereupon Wallace declared that US/UK communications had been breached and hopped aboard a plane to DC for an urgent face to face with a variety of muckety mucks there. Mercouris concludes that the most reasonable explanation in the circumstances is that the Russians did, indeed, breach secure US/UK comms and learned something about dirty bombs—or discussions about dirty bombs. Or something very like that.

After this flurry of communications between the Kremlin and the collective West, the collective West formally denied everything. Kind of. But Shoigu says Russia has “double verified” the evidence. It sounds like they have the goods on the collective West plotting a nuclear event. I don’t know about you, but I sure as sh*t didn’t vote for nuclear war.

So consider this


Looks like Russia was able to intercept and decode conversations between MI6 and the Pentagon. Suspicions are that the conversation was related to the assembly and use of a Dirty Bomb in the Ukraine. The British Defense Secretary had to fly to Washington same day due to breach 

For months Defense Sec Shoigu had zero contact with Western counterparts then suddenly he calls the Turkish, British, French and American Defense secretaries in all probability about the dirty bomb findings. That very same day the British defense secretary has to fly to Wash. 

Def sec Shoigu the next day confirms to the media that they have double verified evidence of the dirty bomb and have presented it to hie respective counterparts in the Western nations that are possibly involved. Is it an MI6 scheme or did the Ukraine go off the reservation again? 

Anyone who discounts this claim as “impossible” is not being sincere. This war is for all the marbles. It is for the direct control over the next Century of economic activity. Just like WW2 was. Folks need to wake up to certain “realities”. 

In the past few days there have been public stories about the possibility of cables being severed in the North sea (around Great Britain) and blaming it on Russian submarines. If these were internet cables the Russians do indeed have this ability to “tap” the lines as it where.


Also note that Russian Space forces have the ability to physically “tap” Western satellites in orbit. Not just signals intelligence intercepts. This is a newer field where the West has been developing counters to such activities.  

….. and I’m not talking about a Cosmonaut saddling up to a satellite. Think more like a small satellite maneuvering over to one of the larger communication satellites and “plugging into a port”. 

The intelligence powers in England are now literally running the country since the political situation is so very screwed up. Nobody is “in charge” at number 10. Not really anyway. This allows for some really nasty shit to happen since nobody will be held accountable. 

So what exactly constitutes a “Dirty Bomb”. In it’s simplest form all one would need is an old X-Ray unit, extract the radioactive elements contained put it in a container surrounded with explosives then place and detonate. 

This is nothing secret nor privileged w/r/t the information. The radioactive isotopes then spread in the wind and activate radiation detectors already in place or with hand held Geiger counters. 

The controlled media then rolls into high gear with headlines of “Nuclear explosion” and mushroom clouds. The MIC Psy Op then initiates that Russia used Nukes or the Ukraine used nukes etc. The people panic and it’s another 9/11 scenario where the public lose their freedom. 

Just imagine the Covid lock downs on steroids. imagine WW2 levels of control where every letter you write gets read by a human and redacted. Just imagine your neighbor ratting you out for saying something against a politician. (STASI) ….. just imagine. 

A dirty bomb is a weapon of terror. The soldiers in such an action are the media. The victims of this terror bombing are you and me no matter how far we are from the event. It is a ploy for total control and domination via fear based mind control. No fear.  

Just so I don’t get a visit from some Alphabet agency or 5 eyes man in black here is a public document of what I am talking about. Older X-Ray units like those in Eastern Europe use Radioactive elements. (Cesium-137)…

This morning I asked: Who’s in charge? The Intel agencies, it would seem. Hopefully, however, the actual military is pushing back on this craziness. Thank God for the Russians calling this out.

Next question: Who’s the enemy—and what are we gonna do about the enemy?

False Flag Warning

MI-6 again?

Here is Sputnik sharing the Russian point of view:

Ukrainian ‘Dirty Bomb’ Threat is Real, Up to West Whether They Want to Believe It or Not: Kremlin

On Sunday, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu warned his French, British, American and Turkish counterparts that Kiev may be preparing a false flag dirty bomb attack on its own territory to blame Moscow for using weapons of mass destruction. Western officials and officials in Kiev have dismissed the warning.

The threat of Ukraine using a ‘dirty bomb’ is real, and it’s up to Western countries whether they want to believe in the danger or not, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said.

“The fact that they do not trust the information which was provided by the Russian side does not mean that the threat of the use of such a dirty bomb ceases to exist. The threat is present. This information was brought to the attention of the [Russian] defense minister’s interlocutors. It’s up to them whether they want to believe it or not,” Peskov told journalists in a briefing Monday.

Separately on Monday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov indicated that Moscow was preparing to raise the issue of Kiev’s possible preparations to use a dirty bomb at the United Nations. The Russian top diplomat emphasized that Moscow’s information on this matter was not an empty claim, and that the foreign ministry has information on the Ukraine-based institutes capable of creating such arms.

“We have specific information about the scientific institutions in Ukraine which have the technology to build a dirty bomb. We have information which we’ve double-checked using the appropriate channels confirming that this is not an empty suspicion, and that there is good reason to believe that such [provocations] can be planned,” Lavrov said.

Russia’s defense ministry reported Sunday that Shoigu had conveyed concerns about Kiev’s potential use of a radioactive dirty bomb in phone calls with his French, British, American and Turkish counterparts. According to Russian military intelligence, the bomb’s development has reached its final stage.

US, European and Ukrainian officials have dismissed Moscow’s concerns, with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba tweeting Sunday that his country was a committed party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and “neither ha[s] any ‘dirty bombs’, nor plan[s] to acquire any.” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky similarly denied the allegations, alleging that “if Russia calls and says that Ukraine is allegedly preparing something, it means one thing: Russia has already prepared all this.”

Moscow’s concerns of Kiev’s possible use of a dirty bomb come amid growing fears a nuclear escalation in Ukraine among Western officials and media, many of them apparently misinformed on (or deliberately fibbing) about Russia’s nuclear doctrine, which prohibits the use of nuclear weapons of any kind in the absence of an existential threat to the nation, or the use of WMDs against Russia.

Russian officials have repeatedly expressed concerns over Ukraine’s potential nuclear ambitions, pointing out that the country has retained nuclear weapons know how since Soviet days, and that Kiev has repeatedly threatened to build such weapons in recent years. On February 19, just days before Russia kicked off its military operation in Ukraine, President Zelensky threatened to revive Kiev’s non-nuclear status. Last year, Ukraine’s ambassador to Germany warned that Ukraine could become a nuclear-armed state again if it wasn’t accepted into NATO. In March, Russian Foreign Intelligence said its information confirmed that Kiev has an active nuclear weapons program.

Ukraine inherited about one third of the USSR’s massive strategic nuclear arsenal after the country’s collapse in 1991, including some 1,700 warheads, but the launch codes remained in Russia’s hands. Ukraine gave up these nukes after signing the 1994 Budapest Memorandum – an agreement which guaranteed Kiev’s security in exchange for its renunciation of nuclear weapons. The agreement was undermined by the February 2014 US-sponsored coup in Kiev in which the country’s democratically-elected government overthrown, sparking a security crisis in eastern Ukraine which ultimately culminated in today’s conflict between Ukraine and Russia.


And again:–1102582411.html

Russian MoD Has Info on Contacts Between Ukraine, UK on Nuke Tech

1 hour ago 

Russian Radiation, Chemical and Biological Defense Troops chief Igor Kirillov. File photo. - Sputnik International, 1920, 24.10.2022

© Photo : Russian Federation Council


Earlier in the day, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced plans to bring up Ukraine’s alleged efforts to stage a dirty bomb provocation up at the United Nations. On Sunday, Russia’s defense minister informed his NATO counterparts on the threat of a Ukrainian dirty bomb false flag attack. Kiev and its sponsors have dismissed the allegations.

The Russian military has information on contacts between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s office and British representatives on the matter of nuclear weapons technology, Igor Kirillov, the head of Russia’s Radiation, Chemical and Biological Defense Troops, has revealed.

“We have information on contacts between the Ukrainian president’s office and representatives of Britain on the possible acquisition of nuclear weapon technology,” Kirillov said in a briefing Monday.

The senior officer echoed concerns outlined by Defense Minister Shoigu on Sunday – namely that Kiev was “planning a provocation involving the detonation of a so-called ‘dirty bomb’, or a low-yield nuclear weapon,” and then claiming that the explosion was caused by a Russian tactical nuclear weapon.

“The purpose of such a provocation is to accuse Russia of using weapons of mass destruction in the Ukrainian theater of operations and thereby launch a powerful anti-Russian campaign throughout the world aimed at undermining global confidence in Moscow,” Kirillov said.

“As a result of such a dirty bomb provocation, Kiev expects to intimidate the local population, increase the flow of refugees across Europe, and ‘expose’ the Russian Federation as a nuclear terrorist,” Kirillov said.


According to the officer, Kiev has the technological potential and industrial base necessary to create a dirty bomb, including three operating nuclear power plants and over 1,500 tons-worth of spent nuclear fuel, plus 22,000 spent fuel assemblies from the defunct Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant containing Uranium-238, as well as other nuclear materials containing Uranium-235 and Plutonium-239. Radioactive agents from the South Ukrainian, Khmelnitsky and Rivne nuclear plants contain uranium oxide enriched to 1.5 percent, according to the Russian military’s information.

“According to the information we have, two Ukrainian organizations have specific instructions to create a so-called dirty bomb. Work on this project is at the final stage,” Kirillov said.

Addition infrastructure which could aid in the production of a dirty bomb includes the newly built Vector radioactive waste processing plant at the Prydneprovsky Chemical Plant in Kamenskoe, central Ukraine has the capacity to accommodate over 50,000 cubic meters of radioactive materials. Furthermore, the Vostochny Mining and Processing Plant is capable of extracting up to 1,000 tons of uranium ore annually.

On top of that, Ukraine has the necessary scientific base to build a dirty bomb – including the legendary Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology, whose scientists took part in the Soviet nuclear power program, plus the Uragan experimental nuclear facility, and the Institute for Nuclear Research at the National Academy of Sciences in Kiev, where research involving highly radioactive materials is being carried out using the WWR-M reactor.

The officer warned that the explosion of such a dirty bomb on Ukrainian territory would spread radioactive isotopes into the atmosphere a distance of up to 1,500 km, spreading into neighboring countries, including Poland.

Syria False Flag

Kirillov recalled that Kiev’s suspected preparations to use a dirty bomb are nothing new, and that “similar information warfare technologies have already been used by the West in Syria, where the White Helmets filmed propaganda videos about the use of chemical weapons by government forces,” culminating in US air and cruise missile strikes. The officer warned that a “similar scenario” may be employed in the event of a false flag attack involving the destruction of a radioactive dirty bomb.

He also recalled President Zelensky’s comments at the Munich Security Conference in February, just days before Russia kicked off its military operation in Ukraine, in which he hinted at Kiev’s plans to restore the country’s status as a nuclear weapons state.

Kirillov’s comments on the danger of a Ukrainian dirty bomb false flag were echoed by Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov earlier in the day. Peskov told reporters that Russia has presented its findings, and that it was up to Western leaders to chose whether they wanted to believe Moscow or not. Lavrov said the foreign ministry has “specific information” on the Ukrainian scientific institutions that could be used to build a dirty bomb, and vowed to draw attention to the matter at the United Nations.

US and European officials issued a joint statement dismissing Moscow’s concerns on Monday, saying they have “made clear that we all reject Russia’s transparently false allegations that Ukraine is preparing to use a dirty bomb on its own territory.” Ukrainian officials similarly dismissed the Russian dirty bomb allegations, with President Zelensky alleging that “if Russia calls and says that Ukraine is allegedly preparing something, it means one thing: Russia has already prepared all this.” Zelensky called on “the world” to “preemptively” step up pressure on Moscow.