Simplicius After-Action Report: Day 1

Simplicius: https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/first-leg-of-afus-offensive-has-begun

Today is the first day we can probably say the offensive has truly begun in the sense that Ukraine has launched large maneuver attacks in exactly the primary directions long-predicted as being at the heart of the offensive. Yesterday’s push much farther east near Velyka Novosilka had long been forecasted as the ‘diversionary’ direction, and today they struck the true direction right under Orekhov where for a long time their main force buildup was observed by Russian recon/intel units.

With the large NATO Air Defender exercises—called ‘the largest ever’—set to begin on June 12, we can only assume that today was the opening act of what’s meant to be a ramp up that will crescendo during the exercises in less than a week. Presumably, Kiev is timing it to make initial breakthroughs from now til then, and then inject their much larger reserve force into the breakthrough zone right at the time of the exercises to achieve a truly triumphal propaganda syzygy.

But, judging by today’s results, that syzygy is more a zugzwang. Russian forces dealt a crushing blow to AFU’s meat-vanguard. Let’s break down how it happened in detail; however, before that, first let’s update a few things about the last advance over the past couple days on Zaporozhye’s eastern flank.

I reported last time how Russia managed to retake Novodonetsk under Velyka Novosilka. But I just wanted to add some of the official numbers to contextualize things. In a somewhat uncommon gesture, Shoigu himself actually gave the exact figures of Russian losses during this assault. They were:

71 Russian servicemen killed, 210 wounded.

So as one can see, Russian forces do take losses in these meat assaults by Ukraine. However, Shoigu’s listed losses for Ukraine for the period were:

Ukraine’s losses from June 4 to June 6 were 3,715 soldiers, 52 tanks, 207 armored vehicles, 134 vehicles, 5 aircraft, 2 helicopters, 48 ​​artillery systems and 53 drones, Mr. Shoigu announced.

Many have scoffed at his figure of 3700 casualties, some saying that you can divide this by 10 and it’s still a lot. We must remember this includes wounded, so the KIA is likely much lower. The above figure is for major assaults over the course of three days. If you break down the 3,700 as probably 1000+ killed and 2700 wounded (give or take), how is that an unrealistic number for three days’ time of June 4, 5, and 6? That would mean 300 killed per day. That’s a light day for AFU even in Bakhmut when they were on defense. Now imagine them on offense, exposed and easy to hit.

Another thing, you see those figures like 52 tanks, 200+ armored vehicles—which too sounds like a lot. Once again that’s over three days. But interestingly, just in today’s new assault in west Zaporozhye, we have visual confirmation of 42 pieces of armor destroyed. That’s just from a couple videos from one unit out of dozens/hundreds of units on these lines. And this is just the videos of mass armor knockouts, there are dozens of videos showing individual pieces being knocked out like Lancets taking out artillery, of which there were at least 5-7 new videos today alone. So imagine what the total destroyed figures are when you extrapolate this out?

So, to get back to today’s offensive and the videos which the above graphics are sourced from, here is one of them, showing by some counts 11 armor/vehicles destroyed at once in one of the directions. It was said some of them hit mines while others were finished off by a combination of artillery and Russian attack choppers:

And another of Ukrainian BMP-2s and other pieces of disabled armor being finished off by Russian drones:

Even Jihad Julian threw one of his famous hissy fits:

Russian Spetsnaz group near Lobkov right on one of the directions:

Another Russian unit on the front says you can’t imagine how many enemies died today, “the number is measured in thousands”, confirming Shoigu’s reports:

Meanwhile, this was an AFU units post regarding the new French AMX-10 tanks they used for the first time in combat yesterday. First, note that we also have video confirmation for the first time of the tanks heading to the frontline:

It was initially once again misgendered as a Leopard, but sharp-eyed experts properly aligned it with an AMX-10 profile:

Of course, I already posted 3 of them destroyed/disabled/abandoned last time. But now here’s what the AFU unit operating them says about the mighty French wunderwaffe’s performance:

Not quite a rousing selling point for French engineering, eh?

Here’s a detailed description of the exact assaults that took place:

About the situation on the Zaporizhzhya front to the present moment.

In the area of ​​the settlement of Stepovoye – Pyatikhatki, the enemy advanced with forces up to the MPV from the 128th Guards Brigade with the support of artillery.

Wedged into the defense up to 1 km in depth, was stopped on the northern outskirts of the Lobkovoe settlement, suffered losses, had no success, stepped up efforts with a tank platoon (4 tanks), made an attempt to bypass Lobkovoe from the west and reach the Kamenskoye settlement, with success did not have, lost all 4 tanks and retreated to the previously occupied line.

On the Gulyaipole-Mezhirich direction, he attacked with the forces of the RTGR from the 23rd Ombr, had no success, got stuck in the defense of the RF Armed Forces and retreated.

On the direction of Olgovskoye – Levadnoye, forces up to the RTGR from the 23rd Ombr wedged into the positions of the RF Armed Forces to the depth of the ROP, stopped, as a result of the counteroffensive of our troops, was thrown back and retreated.

On the Novopol – Novodarovka direction, with the help of the RTGR from the 23rd Ombr, with the support of a tank platoon, he tried to attack our positions, but he had no success, he retreated.

In the area of the Vremievsky ledge, west of the Neskuchnoye settlement, forces up to the RTGR from the 31st Ombre, wedged to a depth of more than a kilometer and managed to enter a height of 178.2, 2 km west of the Storozhevoye settlement.

In summary: the enemy seeks to capture the dominant heights in order to begin to create a springboard for a broad offensive and the introduction of 4 reserve brigades from 10 AK into battle.

The above map shows roughly the settlements they attacked on the western flank. But as can be seen from the description above, they made several other axes further east, close to Velyka Novosilka (on its western side).

Bar none the best military analyst on Twitter @MNormanDavies drew up this map of the AFU’s potential plans. The “A” line is the feint around Velyka Novosilka:

Enemy radio networks are overloaded. A large number of enemy equipment, we are told from the ground, has set in motion.

The NgP intelligence channel details: The enemy deployed the forces of 4 brigades of the 10th Army Corps for offensive operations in the direction of Orekhov – Tokmak – Melitopol.

🔴 Composition: 115, 116, 117, 118 OMBR.

🔴 In total: up to 20 thousand people, up to 90 tanks, up to 180 AFVs, up to 120 MLRS, up to 80 field artillery guns and mortars.

➡️ The goal of the enemy: a rapid breakthrough to the south and the blocking of Melitopol from the north.

The plans of the enemy are also known in advance, the calculation of the factor of surprise did not materialize, and this time, a warm welcome is provided.

Several of the above mentioned brigades are part of the special 9 developed by the West and armed with Western armor. However, they have not been committed yet but appear to be getting ready to be used as the breakthrough force after the meat assaults punch a hole in the Russian defenses first.

I said last time that the AFU strategy will be as follows:

They will increase the pressure on all these fronts in order to try to find a weak point. In a sense, it’s a larger scale continued recon-by-fire, but it seems a final preparatory one rather than the initial, much smaller speculative ‘feeler’ ones we’ve had for weeks.

But here’s the kicker. If they don’t find a weak spot and continue to be brutally rebuffed as they have been so far, the AFU plans to simply never announce this as the offensive. They will just pretend they are ‘testing’ Russia and the mythical offensive is still yet to come at some arbitrary and obscure future time.

But if they do find a weak spot, they will throw everything to punch through it and then ex post facto claim this was the major offensive all along. In short, they’re playing the dual psychological game I had already described long ago, the sort of phantom Schrodinger’s Offensive, where the plan is to characterize the actions afterwards depending on their success.

Another analysis from today:

⚡️Explanation to the previous summary.

According to the latest data, the forces from the 10th army corps of the strategic reserve of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which we wrote about in the previous report, were attached to the current grouping in the Orekhov-Pologi direction, consisting of 3 brigades: 65 ombr, 128 ogshbr, 108 brigades.
The personnel of the 115th, 116th, 117th, 118th ombres took part in combat coordination on the territory of the Sumy region;

Also, in the operational reserve, the enemy keeps 3 formations: 5 brigade 10 AK, 23 ombr, 5 oshbr, which is planned to be brought into battle to develop success, if such is achieved by the forces of the main group.

The enemy made a big bet on the mobility of his formations, and through this on the factor of the sudden appearance of a grouping at the front – this calculation is untenable.
At the moment, they are trying to break into the defense of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation with forces of 108 obt, and then expand the wedging with the main forces, a classic meat assault with a “spent” terodefense, all according to the “zaluzhny”.

The common theme is that they’re probing in force, but the main breakthrough force is being positioned at the rear and ready to swing in as soon as the vanguard units find an opening. But the danger is that this breakthrough force is gigantic, and it is likely comprised of the main elite Western-trained brigades.

Turks continue to leak insiders

According to them, in the north of the Zaporozhye region, the Ukrainian army is preparing a new, larger corps of 30,000 people for a breakthrough from the Orekhovsky line towards Melitopol.

The Armed Forces of Ukraine plan to strike with the forces of 100-150 tanks, 300 guns and MLRS, and from 500 to 1000 units of light armored vehicles, overcome minefields with masses of equipment and manpower, break through the Russian defensive lines, and then create a bridgehead where it is planned to introduce a group of not more than less than 50,000 bayonets. It is designed to expand the breakthrough.

To mask the main direction of attack, small attacks and artillery shelling continue along the front line.

The moment Ukraine launches an offensive of this magnitude, it will literally enter the final phase of its military effort, and the cessation of such attacks will be the clearest sign of Ukraine’s final defeat.

Ukraine has no other choice but to win, otherwise, in the face of a war of attrition, its current 4 million people in the form of already drafted, killed, commissioned and mobile resources will sooner or later be exhausted.

All Russia needs to do is properly use its firepower and manpower reserves to prevent any attempt to push its group back.

But recall what I said: if they do not achieve a breakthrough, they will scuttle this and pretend there was never anything serious, it was all just Russian propaganda and they were merely conducting testing strikes. This is my caveat to future people who may accuse me of having announced the final offensive. The truth is, this is it, but they are still dipping one toe in with the other foot on shore so they can pretend they never intended to launch should things go sour. And of course, I still predict that they will not get a breakthrough so that is to say don’t actually expect the “big one” to come. However, the forces are positioned to launch this ‘big one’ the moment a breakthrough comes, so there is a chance—I simply give it a higher probability that they won’t breach.

Recall that, as large as those numbers above sound—a 30,000 man breakthrough force followed by a 50,000 man reserve to expand the breakthrough once it’s unleashed—I’ve noted previously that some sources estimate Russia has close to 200k men on this front waiting for these advances. Most of them would likely be way in the rear, or not even injected into the actual theater yet (i.e. could be in Crimea, etc.) but that is the totality of what they can bring to bear there in a short amount of time to plug holes on any ‘breakthroughs’.

With that said, the intel remains very dangerous for UA’s capabilities here. For instance, top Russian analyst channel Two Majors has the following analysis of today. Note the sophisticated use of EW warfare, accurately reconnoitered fires to Russia’s rear, professional de-mining operations, and advanced equipment like nightvision for incoming nighttime operations:

The Two Majors résumé of the day: Zaporozhye Front. Preliminary Conclusions.

Fighting and artillery duels continue. The enemy is actively using drones.

Today, the enemy threw in the frontline units of the strategic reserve—the 10th Army Corps and the 128th Alpine Assault Brigade in the direction of Kamensky and Orekhovo. The goal was to conduct battle reconnaissance and de-mine the terrain with Soviet and NATO systems. The enemy engaged in active electronic warfare.

On average, in various tactical direction, the Ukrainians used up to two motorized infantry companies per direction, supported by tanks, and, in the course of combat, regrouped and reinforced the forward units with tanks and infantry. The enemy conducted strikes on our command posts in the rear with artillery and rocket fire.

The Ukrainian forces suffered significant losses among the forward groups and retreated.

The goal of the AFU’s actions was:

▪️To uncover our defense system

▪️To verify the location of our artillery positions

▪️To test the electronic warfarE in relation to our nodes and communication channels

▪️To de-mine the first echelons of the Russian Armed Forces’ defense

▪️ To compromise the effectiveness of the artillery of the Russian Armed Forces in our defense zone and neighboring formations.

The main enemy forces have not yet been engaged in combat. According to military command estimates, the AFU has amassed about 20,000 personnel for the main strike in order to reach Melitopol via Tokmak.

Our troops are ready – night and morning strikes are likely. The enemy has massively supplied the drivers and mechanics with night vision implements.

The enemy is also driven forward by the anticipation of the change in the weather—heavy rains are expected after the 12th/13th, and the specific density of the ground in such conditions will be a serious factor for the passability of equipment.

The battle continues. Right now there are artillery duels and enemy UAVs are operating.

And Rybar has further intel which appears to indicate much larger coming pushes soon:

In the tactical group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine “Marun”, which, apparently, will form the shock backbone of the offensive forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the organization of communication and combat control systems between the airborne assault units (46 oaembr, 82 odshbr, 71 ebr and 132 reconnaissance units) is currently being debugged.
Most likely, the next attempts, and more massive ones, will be made in the near future. Additional batteries, ammunition and uniforms were issued to the Ukrainian formations on the front line today, and they were put on alert for active combat operations. (Rybar)

Thus far, Russian forces are holding admirably and giving almost no ground at all as far as I can tell. There was one complaint from an analyst about an alleged small breakthrough just west of Lobkove in the Kamyanske direction (far west of Orokhov/Orikhiv). However, I haven’t seen any actual confirmation this actually happened, so his complaints may be premature.

The fighting happened just like in the Novodonetsk direction. The AFU would push with a lot of light armor and MRAPS which would hit minefields then be picked apart by Russian Ka-52s and artillery. And there are several new videos showing the Ka-52s in action:

What’s funny is that Russian troops state that the airmen tell them they love the American Maxxpros in particular as their very tall outlines presents such a juicy fat target to destroy:

Ka-52 + Vikhr = Max Pro goes to hell.

Our guys tell us that all those American tall huge boxes are awesome targets.

But now, let’s get back to the Novodonetsk battles of the past three days near Velyka Novosilka, as there are a few other important updates to make on that.

We’ve already covered how absolutely shredded the AFU got in that advance attempt. But now we also have further confirmations from their own side streaming en masse. There have been two separate videos released of their own 37th brigade pleading with leadership, saying they were told it was an ‘empty village’ and they got slaughtered:

Fear and Loathing in Novodonetsk

Yesterday the Ukrainian army stormed Novodonetsk, and today there have already been revelations from one of the participants of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

They marched without artillery preparation, without tank support – and they got it in full in the village. About 60 people died in the battalion, many were injured.

The soldier already understands that they have become cannon fodder and the president has deceived them, but it is too late, alas….ragulo goes to the right side THE RUSSIAN ARMY FIGHTS FOR GOOD

One was a lone drunk soldier, the other was an entire unit:

The personnel of the 505th of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, sent to capture a deserted village in the Zaporozhye region, were attacked by Russian UAVs and artillery for 5 hours, saying that they suffered heavy losses and reacted harshly to the poor command and indifference of the officers.

In the Bakhmut area, a similar incident occurred with the 57th separate motorized infantry brigade, and it was forced to evacuate forward positions as a result of heavy shelling.

Some claimed the ‘drunk’ one was a fake, yet the same soldier actually released multiple videos lambasting the AFU command; unfortunately it’s not subtitled.

Ukrainian accounts quickly sprang into action to claim it’s “fake”, but here’s the kicker, Russian forces recovered massive amounts of documents from the hundreds of casualties that this group incurred:

They published all of them in full, you can easily find the zoomed in, detailed scans.

Demilitarisation,Denazification,Denulandisation,DeNATOization,DeMaidanization,DeUkrainization continues…

Soldiers fomr the 40th Marine Brigade searched the abandoned bodies and equipment of their “colleagues” Marines from the 37th separate communications Regiment of the AFU in Novodonetskoye and brought various documents.

It’s not just passports that are interesting here. You should have seen how much waste paper the enemy brought with him to the assault.

There are reports, and lists of personnel, and callsign tables along with combat control signals, staff schedules, handouts of dry rations and ammunition… Someone even went on the attack with a medical card, and someone holding a bank contract under his heart.

Now Novodonetskpoye is under Russian Army control again, the AFU has been successfully finished off and cleaned out during the counterattack. Previously, the AFU lost about 50 personnel.

The report above states there are tons of useful military documents recovered from their bodies, highly secret OPORD docs, etc.

What’s shocking is that the 37th is one of the 9 big elite Western-trained brigades. This is the one in the Pentagon leaks that was allocated the French AMX-10s as well as the Mastiffs. What’s interesting is that we now have confirmation of several mastiffs destroyed as well as yesterday’s AMX-10s, which proves this 37th is operating here:

Destruction of British armored vehicles during the enemy attack on Novodonetskoye

Fighters of the Southern Group destroyed British Mastiff armored vehicles during the battles for Novodonetskoye at the junction of the DPR and the Zaporozhye region.

The first Mastiff was hit from an ATGM on board, after which the combat vehicle caught fire. One of the crew members managed to get out and escape from the battlefield.

The second car was hit by a mine, after which the enemy hastily began to pull out their 300s. The footage shows how the militants leave the wrecked car and try to return to their original positions on foot.

Here you can clearly see the knocked out Mastiffs as well as many other vehicles. This settlement you see in the pictures is actually Novodonetsk:

And here are the geolocations of where the Mastiffs were destroyed:

#Geolocation of Ukrainian🇺🇦 forces while storming #Novodonetske two of their MRAPs got disabled.

Yesterday we receivied information that Russian🇷🇺 troops retake the full control over these village

S1📌47.751500, 36.958015

S2📌47.756374, 36.956753

So, basically: the 37th is already being shredded and this was one of the big bad NATO-trained formations that was supposed to slice through Russian forces like a hot knife through butter.

The Pentagon OPORD leaks had the brigade as:

37th BDE:

30 x Mastiff / Husky (UK)
30 x Mastiff / Wolf (UK)
30 x Senator (Canada)
14 x AMX-10 (France)
16 x Tanks (unknown)
12 x D-30 artillery

So out of the above we already have confirmation of a bunch of Mastiffs taken out, at least 3 AMX-10 visually confirmed and 1 Senator, as well as numerous tanks and countless infantry.

And if that wasn’t enough proof of the hiding they’re taking, check this weepy post about a unit from Ukraine’s 57th brigade. Not a single person returned from the offensive:

But worry not, one of AFU’s commanders said that the true purpose of the grand counter-offensive is to not allow Russian troops to advance:

😐🇺🇦⚔️🇷🇺Alexander Tarnavsky, commander of the operational-strategic grouping of the AFU “Tavria”, said that the counteroffensive consists in the fact that the AFU does not allow Russian troops to advance…

Klitschko has found himself a worthy opponent…

Zaporozhye front. In the area against N. p. Novodanilovka.

So all this time, the counter-offensive was actually a reverse counter-offensive whose purpose was to simply keep Russia from conquering more territory. This is akin to Budanov’s statement that Crimea has already been conquered by Ukraine…psychologically.

Now, that things are heating up, and UA is starting to get aggressive with their usage of prime equipment, we’ve had a slew of confirmations of prestige system kills from today alone.

Firstly, what appears to be the first ever Swedish CV-90 IFV destroyed:

This is widely considered by many to be the world’s best infantry fighting vehicle, and was one of the most elite and advanced pieces of kit sent to Ukraine.

Now, the Russian Lancet has gotten the first ever confirmation kill on the German IRIS-T air defense. Ukraine has very few units of this and this is one of NATO’s most expensive and powerful AD systems:

🇷🇺🚀💥🔥🇺🇦🇩🇪 Confirmation of the destruction of part of the IRIS-T battery by a Russian “Lancet” drone.

Arrival of the “Lancet” into the locator of the multifunctional German radar Hensoldt TRML-4D from the IRIS-T SLM SAM.

The radar is clearly disabled,out of the game and will not serve the UkroReich anymore…

Radar is the most important component of the system,SAM system is literally blind without them,so this was excellent decision and excellent hit…

But even with these victories, I don’t want to get overcocky as Ukraine still has a lot of offensive potential left, and only one of the big 9 brigades has been fully committed thus far. Even as of this writing there is news that the AFU has regrouped and is spotted coming towards Russian positions again, this time at night.

Some believe they perhaps will attempt night attacks under the hope that their putatively ‘better’ Western nightvision/thermal optics in the new Western-supplied vehicles can outperform the equipment of Russian defenders. This is particularly in regard to if they are to finally use the American Bradleys, German Leopards, British Challengers, etc. (fat chance of that). Like I said, the next few days may only continue ramping up in intensity to hit a peak crescendo by the time of the NATO exercises at which point they may have some “surprise” in store.

In the meantime, former Ukrainian presidential advisor believes that Zelensky could be overthrown if he fails in this counter-offensive:

🇺🇦 Zelensky can be overthrown in a failed counteroffensive

This was stated by the former adviser to the second President of Ukraine Kuchma Oleg Soskin.

He believes that the consequences of the explosion of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station in the Kherson region are larger for Ukraine than the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant.

📝 “If the counter-offensive bogs down, then an internal uprising will begin. Zelensky’s power is melting like snow in the sun. The vital resources of Zelensky, Yermak and this group are evaporating. Now his homeland Krivoy Rog will perish without water,” the expert said in his blog.

And one of the best most level-headed war bloggers/correspondents/commentators, Sladkov, has this to say about the offensive:

👉Sladkov

Kyiv STRETCHES THE FRONT, WAR GETTING EXPENSIVE

Both for us and for the enemy. The calculation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to pull apart our defensive potential: either they will strike at Zaporizhia, then in Ugledar, then near Gorlovka, now the Belgorod sector has become more active.

I don’t understand, what’s the point of the military then? Any enemy activity, any attack is being prepared in the rear, and now we are masters in defeating Ukrainian rear clusters and formations, we don’t care where our missiles and Geraniums are directed, to this region of Ukraine or to this one.

Most likely, Kyiv, despite the American “come on, come on,” decided to give priority to the information front, not having confidence in a purely military victory. Logically. They create a “nix” on a lot of attacks, and talk a lot about it.

It would be more profitable for us to have their decisive attack, with a decisive defeat of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In Kyiv, they understand this, and imitate violent activity. Our combat potential, primarily due to the efforts of the military-industrial complex, is growing every day.

Now let’s move onto some sundry updates about various other ongoing situations.

First, let’s start with a small update on the Kakhovka dam. Earlier today, Twitter “community notes” attempted to debunk the narrative that Ukraine was playing with the water levels of the Kakhovka reservoir. But soon after, their own ‘fact check’ was destroyed when new footage was released from residents upriver showing that Ukraine’s hydro-electric plants had in fact massively opened up their sluice gates. Here are both of the videos compiled:

The man recording even says, “I’ve never seen this in my life.”

⚡️⚡️⚡️Meanwhile, at the moment, the locks are still open in DneproGES (Ukrainian controlled), which means that the Ukrainian leadership is not interested in stopping the flood…and the Western media is silent⚡️⚡️⚡️

Vladimir Rogov appears to believe that the lowering of the Kakhovka Basin water levels will actually increase the risk of Ukraine landing to try to seize the ZNPP nuclear plant at Energodar:

💥💥💥⚡️ The lowering of the water level in the Kakhovka Basin due to the weakening of the dam of the hydroelectric power plant of the same name located downstream of the Dnieper increases the risk of landings by militants of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to capture the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant.

This was stated by Vladimir Rogov, leader of the “We are together with Russia” movement.💥💥💥

And on the note of the Dnipropetrovsk hydro-electric plant being opened up by Kiev prior to the Kakhovka event to raise water levels, we have the first truly high level Russian confirmation of this. Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev stated the following:

Patrushev: Kyiv released water to Dnipropetrovsk HPP a day before the attack on Kakhovka Secretary of the Security Council of Russia Nikolay Patrushev said today that, on the order of Kiev, water was released in the Dnipropetrovsk hydroelectric power plant, a day before the attack on the Kahovka HPP. “On the orders of Kyiv, 24 hours earlier there was a massive water release at the Dnipropetrovsk HPP, and then there was an attack on the Kahovka HPP, which led to terrible consequences,” said Patrushev, TASS reports.

One very ominous development is that the Kakhovka dam situation has markedly shifted the rhetoric from topic Russian leadership. The above-mentioned Patrushev, who is said to be in the innermost circle of Putin, and who not only used to be the director of the FSB but once considered as the leading candidate for the future presidency of Russia, stated in a new interview that the Kiev regime needs to be “replaced” and Ukraine itself must become a neutral state:

The new goal of the SMO is the demolition of the Nazi regime in Kiev.

It seems that new specifics have been added to the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine as the goals of the SMO.

“Washington and London created the Kiev Nazi regime, which must be replaced, giving Ukraine the status of a neutral state in practice,” said Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev (pictured) in an interview with Belarusian Security Council Secretary Alexander Volfovich.

However, Russian state Duma deputy Elena Panina went even further stating that the only way to ensure Russia’s security is for the entirety of Ukraine to be incorporated into Russia as a federal district, i.e. total absorption of the state of Ukraine:

Elena Panina, director of the Institute of Russian Strategic Studies, draws the right conclusion: “Unfortunately, Ukraine already had the status of a neutral state – until February 2019, when a clause on striving for the EU and NATO was introduced into the country’s constitution. However, that status did not affect either on the terror of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Donbass, nor on the systemic Russophobic policy of Kiev, which has been openly progressing since 1991.

Is it possible for a neutral, non-Nazi, peaceful regime to emerge in Ukraine today? Only if the current owners of Ukraine represented by the United States agree to this. Are there many chances for this? No.

Rather, one can imagine that for some incredible geopolitical reasons, after the completion of the SMO, Russia for some reason decides to create a new buffer state on the territory of Ukraine – with the same name and with some kind of neutral status. But this will be an extremely unfortunate decision, which sooner or later will again turn Ukraine into “Anti-Russia” – otherwise it is not clear why this part of the Russian world should be separated from the Russian Federation at all.

It turns out that the only promising implementation of the neutral Ukraine plan is the Ukrainian Federal District of the Russian Federation.”

Several days ago I already posted how Dmitry Medvedev called for the total “extermination” of the Kiev Nazi Regime. Today, he issued another statement calling not only for the total overthrow of the ‘Nazi Regime’, but he interestingly gave us a clue by stating that as soon as Russia defeats the Ukrainian ‘counter-offensive’, Russia must launch a massive offensive of its own:

From Dmitry Medvedev on Telegram:.

“The enemy has long promised a great counteroffensive.

And it looks like something has already started.

No surprises, since the Kiev regime has no choice. We must attack. It is necessary to justify the received loot and weapons. The disappointment of the owners can cost Zelensky&Co not only posts, but life itself.

A few reports from American agents, who have long been in command of the SBU, are enough, and the whole cocaine shobla will be instantly written off as scrap.

They will be accused of wasting American taxpayers’ money. Moreover, they will do it by someone else’s hands, as they like in Langley: they will give the order to radical scumbags to slap a drug addict for treason to the Republic of Ukraine and the Bandera cause, and then hang him by his feet along with his henchmen, as they once hung the Duce and his fascist junta on Loreto Square in Milan.

Therefore, the Kiev regime has only one way out – to go to the end, sending thousands of mobilized to death.

But in this case, we should not underestimate the enemy.

The enemy and the Western world that supports him are ready to do anything to wipe our country off the face of the earth.

Therefore, now the main thing is to concentrate as much as possible and give a decent answer. Our army has a significant advantage in aviation, armored forces, and high-precision weapons. And, of course, moral high ground.

We need to stop the enemy, and then launch an offensive.

Our goal today is not only to liberate our lands and protect our people. His goal is the complete overthrow of the Nazi Kiev regime, which entrenched itself in the country of 404.”

Yes, he actually called Ukraine ‘Country 404’. For some reason I thought that was only Saker’s trademark, but I guess Medvedev is now using it too.

The important thing to note about all this is that, for everyone who’s been worried on whether Putin will end up selling out and going soft on Ukraine, more and more recently his top siloviki have been giving us big clues as to the interior mood inside the Kremlin and their inner circle. It’s very difficult to imagine Putin would back down from maximalist objectives in light of how strongly his inner circle is now signaling their intentions.

Now, a few notes on the Belgorod region situations. Ukraine’s phantom offensive into the region continues generating nothing but fake psyop vapor while they continue to slowly be liquidated. Here is a large cache of high end mercenary gear recovered from a batch of liquidated agents in the Novaya Tavolzhanka region:

The biggest thing to note is the very expensive, $200k+, Black Hornet Nano used by U.S. special forces. Russian Archangel Spetsnaz group was said to have swept Novaya Tavolzhanka and even made a video challenging the cowardly RDK group to come and fight them and not hide in the forests as they have been doing.

The Black Hornet Nano was not adopted for service with regular troops due to its high cost:

200,000 dollars a unit

Nobody gives that equipment to units without extensive training, probably mercenaries from Western SoF corps.

This is where the cowardly group appears to be hiding from Russian Spetsnaz:

They get chased out then crawl through the forests playing peekaboo and popping out for five minutes to take some photos inside the village, then run away again. Also, their equipment is being systematically found by Russian recon in the forests and destroyed.

As for Belgorod, the AFU is spreading as much psyops and propaganda as possible about mass chaos and panic in Belgorod, Shebekino, etc., but that’s not the case. Not only have I personally seen a bunch of interviews with Belgorod residents who are either upbeat or not concerned at all, but this journalist confirms it:

“Belgorodites cannot be intimidated” – the psychological attack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine failed.

Despite the massive shelling, terrorist attacks and rampage of sabotage groups, the inhabitants of the Belgorod region are not afraid and are ready to continue the fight against the Nazis, said Russian journalist Ivan Pankin, who is in the Belgorod region.

The studio asked if the psychological attack of the Ukronazis to intimidate the inhabitants of Russia was successful.

“If we are talking about Belgorod, the city lives its own life, everything is in order here. For example, I saw a huge number of weddings in the central square.

I don’t see any panic here at all. In terms of the psychological atmosphere, everything is in order,” Pankin said.

He stressed that the same sentiment prevails in areas closer to the border.

“And I observed the same thing yesterday in the districts. I went to those sections where the exit is not blocked – Krasnoye, Shchetinino, Golovino. I visited there, looked at some of the destruction, something is already being restored.

And people say, “It’s no big deal. Well, if they destroy it, we will rebuild it.” Such sentiments. So to intimidate – no, Belgorod residents cannot be scared,” summed up the journalist.”

A few other things, firstly I had promised to mention the Russian MOD blooper, when they misidentified the Ukrainian combine harvester or farming tractor for a Leopard:

But the interesting angle others haven’t covered is that the so-called ‘tractor’ appears as pitch black on the reverse-contrast thermal view. Typically very ‘hot’ objects would appear that dark, while cold objects appear lighter in color.

This would seem to indicate the farming equipment was active. So the big question is, why were there active farming tractors with engines running in the middle of a mass Ukrainian offensive? Either the ‘farmers’ were really oblivious and reckless or the AFU deliberately staged their tank advance through active farm fields in the midst of sowing/harvesting in order to disguise themselves behind civilian shields. Or perhaps it wasn’t a tractor after all, though it admittedly does look like one.

Either way, it appears the MOD made an embarrassing mistake here but my tu quoque argument will be: why do people pretend that a single mistake by the Russian MOD is so critical when the U.S. Pentagon is literally known worldwide as the kings of misattribution, misidentification, etc. How many Afghan weddings did they mistake for army groups? How many civilian cars did they mistake for various types of military gear? There are so many cases of the U.S. wrongfully identifying targets that it’s not even a competition—Russian MOD stands no chance at the U.S. crown here. I won’t even get into the needless deep-dive of U.S. failures but if we’re going to judge optics by critical ‘mistakes’ made then U.S. craft have the worst optics in the world, as the number of wrongfully struck targets and killed civilians they’re responsible for is nearly uncountable.

And some have laughably and disingenuously made fun of ‘Russian optics’, claiming the Ka-52’s EO/optics are so bad they can’t tell a farm tractor apart. Yet they fail to note that most of these kills are at ranges exceeding 10-15km. For that distance, those optics are excellent; anyone who doesn’t think so simply doesn’t know anything about military optics. You can’t compare a 15km missile kill to a video of an AH64 Apache guns kill which are at most like 500m to 1km since 30mm chainguns can’t fire that far.

I think I’ve recounted this before but all you must do is use a stopwatch to time how long the Ka-52’s missile takes to reach the target. In some of the video kills I posted it was upwards of 18-20 seconds. The 9K121 Vikhr missile they use has a speed of 600m/s which means 18s x 600m = 10.8km.

In other news:

new WashPost article is calling Ukraine’s new offensive an all-or-nothing D-Day. What’s interesting is how all Western press now frames the offensive exclusively as revolving around the objective of freezing the conflict. They clearly no longer see victory as possible whatsoever:

Military campaigns are rarely all or nothing, but this one comes close. If Ukraine can drive back an already shaky Russian army, it stands a chance of forcing Moscow to bargain for an end of its failed invasion. But if Ukraine fails, it would be a bitter blow to the country’s weary population and could endanger continued support from some restless NATO members.

By the way, the article repeats a completely fabricated narrative invented by ISW and co. that Ukraine gained a massive 10km in their push. No such gains were made and in fact after suffering horrific losses, the AFU was pushed back pretty much to the starting line. But it shows the level of propaganda being pumped to a completely delusional Western audience that slurps up this slop and asks for seconds.

The hilarious article tries to stir up mythic images of improbable victory by invoking not only the American Revolutionary War and the Civil War but even the Battle of the Bulge of WW2.

It ends on an utterly cretinous passage that can only be characterized as gaslighting the poor Ukrainians into a further slaughter by propping them up on false hopes built on shaky foundations of fake propaganda:

Against these failed breakouts, D-Day stands as a reminder that an army must sometimes take huge risks to position itself for eventual victory. Any visitor to Omaha Beach in Normandy will recall the steep cliffs at Pointe du Hoc that American Rangers had to scale to dislodge German forces. The grave markers for the soldiers who died on D-Day seem to stretch almost to the horizon. But they won the battle — and the war.

Well, at least one positive from this drastic tone change is that even the twisted Western propagandists now clearly acknowledge that this is the final hail mary hurrah on which everything rests.

A last couple of items. I had mentioned some Taiwanese mercenaries last time, but now one of them has returned home and offers up some candid insights into the AFU’s losses. He states in an interview that his unit suffered 50% losses, the platoon was completely annihilated twice. And he said, they did not even fight in ‘the deadliest zone’ of the conflict:

🇹🇼🇺🇦💀Taiwan volunteer soldier describes his experience fighting for Ukraine – Taiwan News

(https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4911497)

Soldier’s unit suffered 50% casualties, 20% killed in action, platoon ‘annihilated twice’

A Taiwanese volunteer soldier in Ukraine’s foreign legion on Sunday (June 4) uploaded a detailed account of the realities of fighting in the Russo-Ukrainian War.

The Taiwanese soldier, who goes by the handle “I don’t know Mount Lushan” (不識廬山), has recently returned from duty in Ukraine and Sunday uploaded an extremely detailed thread with advice to would-be volunteers considering joining the fight. Topics he covered were the expenses, physical demands, necessary language skills, combat training needed, and the mentality one should possess.

The volunteer’s post was generated in response to the many inquiries he received from readers about joining the International Legion of Territorial Defence of Ukraine (ILDU) and had the objective of helping the public fully comprehend the situation in Ukraine and “think twice before making a decision.” That same day, Lai Cheney-wei (賴正瑋), a former chemistry professional and war analysis blogger in Taiwan, posted full English and Japanese language translations of the soldier’s original Chinese post.

He said that many experienced soldiers from the West would break down and quit due to the many hardships and, unlike Ukrainian soldiers, the legion’s members are not protecting their homelands, and are therefore more prone to desertion.

Another tidbit was that Rybar appeared to have gotten confirmed intel that 20 seamen infact died on the Ukrainian ship Yuri Olefirenko which was destroyed by Russia last week, with another 23 badly wounded.

🇺🇦 We would like to add to our colleagues from the Turned in the War that the number of injured sailors on the medium landing ship “Yuri Olefirenko” may be more: 20 were liquidated and 23 were injured .

So we can say with confidence that the hit on Olefirenko turned out to be very accurate.

👉rybar

Another thing: many Ukrainian channels are claiming that the Kakhovka dam breach destroyed [enter ridiculous number here] amounts of Russian troops, gear, etc. But in fact no such thing happened. Not only have videos appeared showing orderly Russian military evacuations in the zone, but even perennial-pessimist Strelkov admitted that Russia evacuated from the at-risk zone with minimal losses of any kind:

Strelkov: According to my data (from the spot) the withdrawal in the flooded lower reaches of the Dnieper was carried out, albeit waist-deep in water, but in a fairly organized manner, with small losses. Troops are being hastily assigned to new frontiers. The evacuation was unexpected both for us and for the enemy. Both sides tried to take advantage of this by actively using artillery. However, according to local reports, the enemy moved a significant part of its reconnaissance and correction units to the Zaporozhye front and its fire was not accurate enough to seriously hinder the redeployment of our units. As for our artillery fire , I have no data on its accuracy. And, yes , apparently, I overestimated the degree of” creativity ” of the enemy command. Breaking the dam, apparently, was not linked to an offensive operation. The enemy was not ready for it, just like our troops. Nevertheless, all the previously described threats (including those to the Kinburn Spit) remain relevant.

Russia in the meantime used huge Mi-8 helicopters to bring troops and equipment in the danger zone to safety:

But not everything was perfect. Rybar reports the following:

One of the most acute problems of the post — Soviet armies is the lack of initiative. Several Russian soldiers who occupied advanced positions in the flood zone after the destruction of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station are missing. Why? They were waiting for the command from above. But she wasn’t. (Rybar)

As of this writing, AFU is renewing an assault in the middle of the night, there are already reports of casualties and a lot of destruction of AFU armor in the same direction from Orekhov in Zaporozhye region. We’ll see what happens and update again next time.

Do You Feel Lucky?

Business Insider had an interesting story today updating the restructuring of commercial real estate: https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/real-estate-market-turmoil-looms-as-tech-giants-flee-offices-watch-these-5-stocks-short-sellers-circling-for-potential-collapse-1032377048

With remotes and hybrids cutting space requirements and banks cutting headcounts, there’s a lot of space out there with nobody in it. And more to hit the market.

Certainly apparent in the unwinding of real estate prices since the Fauci/Pfizer Shutdowns

.. which have banks tightening standards …

… and loan balances going “dead stick”loans go neutral”.

Here’s Business Insider to identify some stragglers in the convoy worth targeting — do you feel lucky?

**********************************************************

The great exodus from workplaces caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the rising adoption of remote or hybrid work is claiming a victim in the market: commercial real estate. 

It could be just the start of a prolonged sector turmoil.

The latest news adds fuel to the fire as Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT) joins the ranks of tech giants looking to sublease its office space in Manhattan’s Times Square. 

Major technology companies, including Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:META) and Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) are also scaling back their real estate footprints — and this trend shows no signs of abating.

Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA)’s  CEO Elon Musk further intensified concerns surrounding commercial real estate with his tweet on May 29. Musk stated, “Commercial real estate is melting down fast. Home values next,” indicating a potential ripple effect in the real estate market.

Return To Office Struggles, Creating Downside Pressure On Commercial Real Estate Prices: According to The Flex Report, the share of people working full time at the office dropped from 49% to 42% in the second quarter of 2023, intensifying challenges faced by the industry.

Office real estate prices have declined 15% over the past year, according to Green Street Commercial Property Price Index.

Peter Rothemund, co-head of strategic research at Green Street, suggested that this may not mark the end of the slump. “There’s not much transacting these days because buyers and sellers can’t seem to agree on pricing,” he said, adding that “these situations eventually resolve themselves, and usually it’s in favor of the buyers.”

Short Interest Rising: 5 Commercial Real Estate Stocks in Focus

SL Green Realty Corp. (NYSE:SLG)

Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (NYSE:HPP)

Vornado Realty Trust (NYSE:VNO)

Office Properties Income Trust (NASDAQ:OPI)

Douglas Emmet Inc (NYSE:DEI)

Chart To Watch: Speculators Have Increased Their Short Bets On CRE Companies This Year

Source: Koyfin

Kapitänleutnant Heinrich Lehmann-Willenbrock and the crew of U-96 in pursuit of a convoy —

“Ladies and Gentlemen it’s … SHOWTIME!”

FILE PHOTO. ©  Sputnik

First, the Russian MOD Morning Briefing

RT breaks it down: https://www.rt.com/russia/577371-whats-next-after-artyomovsk

Countering the counter-offensive: What’s next for the conflict in Ukraine?

With neither side willing to pay the price for a full on assault, battles this summer are likely to stay local

Following the nine-month battle for Artyomovsk (Bakhmut), which is now in Moscow’s hands, the hostilities between Russia and Ukraine are set to enter a new stage. Although currently the front is experiencing a period of relative calm, this is not likely to last long as both sides will want to make the most of favorable summer conditions. Despite the losses suffered in Artyomovsk, both Moscow and Kiev want to earn a decisive victory over the enemy and avoid a prolonged war. 

What developments can we expect at the front in the near future?

Strengths and weaknesses 

Due to the superior operational capacity of Russia’s military-industrial complex, at current output levels, compared to that of NATO, a prolonged conflict may have some benefits for Russia. For example, in 2022, the United States produced only 14,000 155mm shells per month. Even as the US plans to increase production volumes (to 85,000 units per month by 2028), this is not enough to fully supply the Ukrainian army and also provide for the needs of the US army. 

Meanwhile, Russia continues to rely on its superior firepower. Despite the shortage of ammunition that affected the units of the People’s Militias of the Lugansk and Donetsk People’s Republics in the fall of 2022, by May 2023 the country had produced enough shells to meet combat needs.

On the other hand, the Russian army is more sensitive to human losses due to political calculations – for example, President Vladimir Putin faces an election next year, should be decide to seek another term in the Kremlin – and clear hesitancy about putting the country on a full war footing. While Ukraine, which is under martial law, still has a large supply of military-aged men and is restrained only by its capacity to arm and train them, such measures are impossible for Russia because of the domestic political reality.

These factors make a prolonged war undesirable for both sides. In the next few years, Ukraine’s Western backers probably won’t be able to maintain the current levels of support – due to natural fatigue, election cycles and economic factors – and Moscow is seeking to avoid a second wave of mobilization. As a result, both sides are placing serious hopes on this summer.

The strategies of the two sides 

An actionable strategy for Russia would be to conduct an operation similar to the Battle for Artyomovsk, forcing the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) to fight within a limited area where Moscow could amass significant artillery power. This tactic would make it possible to neutralize the AFU’s presumed manpower advantage and weaken its forces, limiting its offensive potential.RT

FILE PHOTO. Crew members of a Russian Army ZU-23-2 anti-aircraft gun are on combat duty for repelling attacks of Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles in the course of Russia’s military operation in Ukraine on the bank of the Kakhovka reservoir in Zaporizhzhia region territory. © Sputnik/Konstantin Mihalchevskiy

Ukraine’s strength lies in the opposite strategy – using maneuverable groups to carry out strikes along the entire front line in order to exhaust Russian reserves, finding a weak spot in the defense, and attempting to break through. If successful, such actions could force Russian troops to retreat from strategically important territories, due to the risk of encirclement, as demonstrated during the battles in the Kharkov region in September 2022.

The role of aviation

Another important factor is the ongoing airwar. This past winter, the Russian Air Force was able to significantly damage Ukraine’s air defense, forcing NATO to provide Kiev with Western systems. In the spring, this operation continued and the Russian military claimed to have destroyed two Patriot missile systems. Despite the challenge of attacking Ukrainian air defense systems and the accompanying losses, the Russian Air Force was responsible for weakening Ukraine’s ability to mount an offensive by bombing warehouses as well as military and transport infrastructure. The Russian Air Force also prevented AFU brigades from being deployed for the offensive and weakened Kiev’s defense of Artyomovsk by striking the rear of its units from Slavyansk all the way to Dzerzhinsk.

Where will the battles take place this summer?

For Russia, which has retained its offensive capabilities, the summer campaign will likely resemble a series of local military operations. The AFU will mostly defend their positions and instead of introducing new units into battle, will try to wait for the exhaustion of Russian troops in order to counterattack. 

Tension is expected in the following areas: 

The “old” state border 

After the retreat of Russia’s Armed Forces from the Chernigov, Sumy, and Kharkov regions, these territories were attacked by artillery fire and sabotage and reconnaissance groups (SRGs). Neither side has the power to form large assault groups and launch a direct offensive here. These battles could have stopped altogether, but the Ukrainians wanted to deal Russia a political and informational blow by making limited strikes on the Bryansk, Kursk, and Belgorod regions to create an image of Russian troop failures (and Ukrainian success).

Ukraine’s strategy here is to weaken Russian reserves. However, this strategy is flawed, since Russia can use its regular conscript army to defend its internationally recognized borders. For example, conscripts took part in repelling a recent Ukrainian raid carried out under the guise of Russian collaborationists (in reality a bunch of extreme neo-Nazis, who have found a welcome in Kiev, where their ideology is tolerated). 

Despite Ukraine’s wish to make Russia concentrate its forces in this direction to the detriment of the Donbass and the Zaporozhye regions, the “old” state border is likely to remain a minor area of combat. 

The Svatovo front

For Russia, positioning the front line along the border of the Oskol and Seversky Donets rivers would be quite desirable. Despite the difference in elevation (the west bank, where Ukraine’s army is positioned, is higher), the defense of this area would demand fewer forces since rivers act as natural barriers. Moreover, this would secure the important ring road around Valuyki –Svatovo–Severodonetsk.

Currently, battles in this area are taking place northeast of Kupyansk, where the Russian army has taken control of several villages in the past 4 months, and near the Kremensk Forests national park. In March of this year, the AFU repositioned several units from here to Artyomovsk, thereby reducing its defensive potential. Russia’s only reason for not attempting to advance further west towards Oskol may be its unwillingness to risk the small number of assault units stationed in this area.RT

The Svatovo front ©  RT

The Seversky ledge

After the battles for Artyomovsk ended with a Russian victory, a layered situation has developed in this area. Firstly, Ukrainian troops are positioned near the city’s western border and rely on their fortifications along the Krasnoe-Minkovka line. This prevents the stabilization of the front along the presently defunct Seversky Donets-Donbass channel. And secondly, the so-called “Seversky ledge” hangs over the grouping’s northern flank.

As the Ukrainian counterattack on PMC Wagner in mid-May demonstrated, this location can be used to threaten Russian troops in Artyomovsk. Moreover, the Russian army also needs to capture Seversk in order to improve connections with troops further north.

The offensive potential of the Russian troops here is currently limited since PMC Wagner units, which fought in Artyomovsk, need a period of respite to restore their full fighting capacity. An offensive in this area can continue either after the Wagner Group fighters resume their work or after the transfer of other assault groups to this site. The presence of a significant concentration of AFU troops who survived the battle for Artyomovsk speaks in favor of continuing the offensive in this direction. If Kiev is able to stabilize this front, the AFU may transfer forces to other areas.RT

The Seversky ledge ©  RT

The Donetsk area

Battles for cities like Avdeevka and Maryinka have been raging since the beginning of the conflict. The Ukrainian defense here relies on urban infrastructure, which over the past eight years has been turned into an instrument of war. Because of this, the AFU managed to secure the front and drag the units of the Donetsk corps into exhausting positional warfare.

By the summer of 2023, Russian troops made positive progress in the area. They took complete control over the multi-storey buildings of Maryinka, were able to push the enemy about 10 kilometers away north of Avdeevka, and attack several roads leading into the city.

A shortage of ammunition and the low efficiency of avitation explains Russia’s problems in this direction. Recently, however, the units of the 1st corps received more munitions and the Russian Air Force has been provided with guided modules for aerial bombs.

Moving the front away from Donetsk – an important political and logistical center – is one of the main goals of the Russian army. This will lower the amount of strikes on this important city – and their subsequent political impact – as well as secure the army’s rear positions. 

​​Ugledar

After the third assault on Ugledar failed because of Ukrainian minefields and an unsynchronized attack by Russian units, Moscow switched tactics and decided to destroy several blocks of multi-story buildings used by the AFU as firing and observation points.

Ugledar is strategically important because of the dominating height that stretches up to Kurakhovo. Ukraine’s defense southwest of Donetsk, including the southern flank of Maryinka, relies on Ugledar. Its capture would allow Russian troops to launch an offensive towards the Zaporozhye-Donetsk highway and assist the operations in Donetsk and Melitopol. The fourth assault on Ugledar should be expected after the Ukrainian positions in the area are suppressed by Russian aviation and artillery.RT

©  RT

Melitopol

This is usually seen as a priority direction for a Ukrainian offensive. A breakthrough of the front near Tokmak and Pology followed by an advance to the Sea of Azov would be disastrous for Russia. The resulting isolation of Crimea from the rest of the country would make the peninsula a vulnerable target.

Over the past fall and winter, the Russian Armed Forces have reinforced this area, creating echelon formations with several fortress cities. This complicates any Ukrainian breakthrough. Moreover, even if the AFU had concentrated enough forces and succeeded in pushing forward, it would have faced flanking attacks by Russian units in reserve as well as air strikes with guided aerial bombs.

Still, the threat to Melitopol hasn’t been completely neutralized. Russia is still forced to amass forces in this area to be able to respond quickly to a potential AFU offensive. However, Ukraine missed an opportunity to completely defeat the enemy here. 

The AFU is unlikely to launch a risky full-scale offensive in this direction. Instead, it will try to further weaken Russian forces in the area, making use of demonstrative attacks and local fighting in order to occupy the gray zone.

The front along the Dnieper River in the Kherson region

Currently, there are no active battles at this section of the front. The sides resort to occasional artillery fire and send sabotage and reconnaissance groups across the river. Neither side possesses sufficient resources for carrying out a major landing operation and supplying its troops in captured territory.  Moreover, even if Ukraine, with its strategy of isolated local attacks, were to engage in such an operation, Russia holds the advantage here. 

***

What do the above considerations leave us with? In one way or another, both sides will not be able to ignore the window of opportunity offered by favorable summer weather. We can expect renewed and more serious activity at the tension points of former battles. However,  neither side will achieve a decisive victory this summer. They are only likely to secure more favorable positions for future combat. Thus, there’s no decisive end in sight. 

By Vladislav Ugolny, a Russian journalist born in Donetsk

Most Climate Warming is Solar-driven?

Citation: Le Mouël, J. L., Lopes, F., & Courtillot, V. (2020). Characteristic time scales of decadal to centennial changes in global surface temperatures over the past 150 years. Earth and Space Science, 7, e2019EA000671. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000671

Le Mouel et al., 2019:

  • applied spectral analysis to the four main data sets of global surface temps (1850-2017)
  • found spectral periods typical of solar activity variation
  • results consistent with most surface variability is natural and primarily solar-driven

Abstract:

We apply singular spectral analysis (SSA) to series of monthly mean values of surface air temperatures T, International sunspot number (ISSN), and polar faculae PF (1850–2017 for T and ISSN). The efficiency of the SSA algorithm that we use has been regularly improved. For the T, ISSN, and PF series, the SSA eigenvalues and first components are shown with their Fourier spectrum. Components of T, ISSN, or PF share similar periods. Most are found in solar activity. The ~22- and ~11-year components are modulated and drift in phase, reflecting slight differences in spectra. On the shorter-period side, components at ~9, ~5.5, and ~4.7 years are in good agreement. They have been identified in solar activity. The 60-year component is prominent in T. It is not immediately apparent in ISSN but can be extracted with an appropriate choice of SSA window. Other types of data allow one to explore longer periods and confirm climatic variations at ~60, ~35, and ~22 years and at 50–150 and 200–500 years. When we consider a longer ISSN series starting in 1700 and recalculate the SSA first component, the trends of solar activity and temperature over the time span from 1850 to 2017 are very similar, with slower rise before 1900 and after the late 1900s, separating a faster rise in much of the twentieth century. These trends, extracted over only 150 years, could be parts of longer, multicentennial changes in solar activity. Much of the variability of surface temperatures could be linked to the Sun.

This paper triggered one comment: Cuypers, Y., Codron, F., & Crepon, M. (2021). Comment on “Characteristic time scales of decadal to centennial changes in global surface temperatures over the past 150 years” by J. L. Le Mouël, F. Lopes, and V. Courtillot. Earth and Space Science, 8, e2020EA001298. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001298

Cuypers observes:

  • No compelling results showing a significant covariability between sunspot amounts and temperature
  • Radiative forcing associated with slow solar components (60 yrs, trend) is very weak over the past 150 yrs, and opposite trend in last 30 yr

Abstract (Cuypers):

Based on Singular Spectral Analysis (SSA) analysis of global earth surface temperature and solar activity (sunspots), Le Mouël et al. (2020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000671) suggest that the variability in Earth surface temperature observed since 1850 is natural and controlled by the Sun. We cannot agree with their conclusions for several reasons: the lack of compelling results from the Fourier spectra and SSA estimates which are provided without confidence intervals, the small radiative forcing associated with the sunspot variability, and finally the simple evidence that the slowly varying components of the temperature and sunspots time show opposite trends in the last 30 years.

Le Mouël responds

  • Find compelling results showing a significant co-variability between sunspot numbers and global temp
  • Offer no mechanism to explain that forcing
  • Temp and sunspot trends are similar with the second component results opposing in the last 30 yrs

Abstract (Le Mouël)

We thank the authors (hereafter referred to as CCC) for providing us an opportunity to clarify some points of our original paper. CCC list in their abstract three “key points”that we respond to in this Reply. The first comment is the central one and the most developed. It deals mainly with discussion of features of methods of spectral analysis, mainly SSA. We have quoted the sub-parts of that comment as items 1a to 1k. The replies to comments/key points 2 and 3 are shorter. We disagree with most of the comments by CCC and explain why. We conclude that we have successfully countered CCC’s criticism and shown many of their points to be unsubstantiated. The main problem seems to reside in differences concerning the literature on Singular Spectral Analysis and our use of it. Much of our response to the comments can be found in textbooks and review papers on SSA and time series analysis; we quote extensively, both in our original paper and in this response to CCC, Golyandina and Zhigljavsky (2013).

The HadCrut series of global surface mean temperature anomalies from January 1850 to January 2017 (https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/; monthly mean values). (bottom) Its Fourier spectrum.

Reconstruction of the HadCrut series using only the first two eigenvalues/components from the singular spectrum analysis (trend and “60 years”). (bottom) Reconstruction of the HadCrut series using the first seven eigenvalues/components from the singular spectrum analysis.

Simplicus SITREP: Zelensky Emails Moscow a GPS?

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/sitrep-52423-uas-desperate-belgorod

Russian Ria Novosti news service reported that a Russian military source reported the news, which was in turn received from insiders in the AFU:

GENICHESK (Kherson region), May 24-RIA Novosti. The Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Valery Zaluzhny, received a head injury and multiple shrapnel wounds during a missile strike carried out by Russian troops in early May at a command post near the village of Posad-Pokrovskoye near Kherson, a representative of the Russian security forces told RIA Novosti, citing his sources in the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

If true, this would obviously be a massive blow for Ukraine and have large implications for any potential ‘offensive’.

The source claims:

“In Nikolaev Zaluzhny was given first aid to stop the bleeding. In the Kiev military hospital, he underwent a cranial trepanation,” the source said.

He added that the commander — in-chief’s condition is complicated by the presence of a concomitant disease-type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The forecast is as follows: he will live, but will not be able to do his job,” the security official concluded.

So, he received a craniotomy after major trauma to his head and brain, and will likely not resume service. However, Ukrainian advisor Danilov issued a statement refuting this, claiming that Zaluzhny reported to work just this morning:

The National Security and Defense Council refutes the statements of the Russian media about the wounding of Commander-in-Chief Zaluzhny. Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council Alexei Danilov said on Twitter that Zaluzhny reported today at the Headquarters of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief.

We don’t know for certain if these are maskirovka games between Russian-Ukraine officials, and could just be a way of Russian officials ‘egging them on’ or trolling them. However, it still remains that Zaluzhny has not truly been seen in public for well over a month, barring the recent pre-recorded video released by an Odessa science institute where he made an address.

Take this as very low confidence, but one rumor even said that Zaluzhny’s coordinates were in fact given to Russia by Zelensky in a plot to remove Zaluzhny from power by convenient methods.

💥💥💥There are rumours that the Office of the President deliberately leaked the coordinates of Zaluzhny’s location (with the aim of eliminating him) near Pavlograd in order to cast Zaluzhny as Syrsky and simultaneously eliminate a potential competitor to Zelensky (or his successor) in future presidential elections.

💥💥💥

Here’s a twitter thread on it which states that it was a former member of the Verkhovna Rada that published this information:

Shocking discovery: Zelensky gave the coordinates of General Zaluzhny to the Russians, after which the rockets flew

Former member of the Verkhovna Rada Ilya Kiva said that the coordinates and time of the location of the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Valery Zaluzhny, were leaked to Russia by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyi. “Zelensky, fearing a military coup, released the coordinates and time of Zaluzhny’s presence, after which a Russian rocket arrived there! That’s how he killed two birds with one stone:

He got rid of the competition and prevented an unsuccessful counterattack by the Armed Forces of Ukraine,” the former MP wrote on his Telegram channel. Ilya Kiva stressed: Whether Zaluzhny is alive or dead is not important.

According to him, the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is now disabled and is no longer dangerous for Zelensky. “Earlier I wrote that Zelensky is preparing the liquidation of the Supreme Commander. Moreover, Zaluzhny is not the first.

Russian SVR chief Naryshkin did confirm he too has similar information about Zaluzhny’s incapacitation, but that it’s not 100% reliable so he can’t say for certain.

****************************************************************

Sorry – can’t resist.

I already have Pacino cast at Z:

So why not this — Michael has Hyman Roth whacked

****************************************************************

Moving on.

The other big news is the Ukrainian Belgorod incursion but I’ll save the biggest for last, as there’s a lot of information to be said about that.

So first, let’s cover the other biggest news, which is that yesterday Prigozhin released a nearly two hour interview where he gave a frank assessment of Wagner troops’ losses in Bakhmut.

There are several variations working their way around the net and being posted because Prigozhin gave the casualty figures in a variety of sometimes confusing, indirect methods.

This is roughly how he broke it down:

  • AFU had 50,000 KIA, with upwards of 70,000 severely injured.
  • Wagner had 3.2 times fewer dead in general, which is another way of saying that the final kill ratio was 1:3.2 in Wagner’s favor.
  • Wagner had 50,000 members at its peak at any one time, the AFU had 82,000 in Bakhmut
  • Out of 50,000 total ex-convict members who went through the ranks, 20% of them died, which is 10,000 KIA just from the ex-con battalions

Now the next part is a little confusing, as some are deriving different numbers from it. On one hand he said that Wagner suffered 3.2 less deaths than the AFU, which suffered 50,000. This would put the total Wagner deaths at 15,600, which, given the above statement, would comprise 10,000 convicts and 5000+ regular contract Wagnerians.

However, other people are reporting 20,000 total KIA based on a different way he worded one of the figures in another segment. Either way it appears to indicate somewhere in the 15-20k KIA for Wagner vs. 50k for the AFU, with wounded also being much less than the AFU.

My own estimate for Wagner’s losses has been in the 5-10k range, and if pressed I would have probably guessed in the middle, at 7k. However, there is some reason, at least according to some people, to believe that Prigozhin could be exaggerating the deaths for political reasons. This would not be out of the ordinary for him, after all recall the stunt he pulled in showing the dead Wagner bodies multiple times to try to really emphasize the losses in a way that some perceived as almost gloating at the number of dead.

For instance, from Donbass Devushka’s channel comes this opinion:

Hi Everyone,

Per this post we reported what Prigozhin said but I wanted to say that, in my personal opinion, he is full of it on this matter.

Mediazona, which is looking for ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING was able to identify at most slightly more than 4,000 prisoners KIA and 1,575 Wagner ‘regulars’ over the course of this 15 month war. Also the prison population of Russia in 2019 was 467,000 (https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2019-02-07/russia-behind-bars-peculiarities-russian-prison-system). I highly doubt Prigozhin got to recruit over 10% of the prison population or even that there were 50,000 prisoners who would even meet Wagner’s admittedly not particularly strict but not exactly carefree standards. As to exact AFU KIA numbers – nobody knows what they are. In view of the pictures we get from new cemetries and what can be observed on the battlefield though both identifable personnel and vehicles losses we can safely say “substantially higher than the Russians by order of magnitude” but that gives us rough ideas, nothing so precise as what Prigozhin says.

Prigozhin has an agenda, and he is angling here for political power and saying that he can fix what is broken. In view of what we posted today from the Ministry of Defense demonstrating substantial Ukrainian losses due to their Belgorod incursion, I at least am not so convinced that the regular Russian military is broken. One of the Generals Prigozhin derides, General Alexander Lapin, led this action himself, from the front. He killed a lot of the Nazis without losing any of his guys, expelled the invaders and recorded it all to ensure that not only were they defeated but also humiliated.

They bring up some good points, citing real statistics, including the fact that MediaZona was only able to verify a tiny fraction of such deaths.

The other thing that attests to this possibility is that, in the very same interview, Prigozhin went on a hyperbolic rant about how Russia has “militarized” rather than “demilitarized” Ukraine thus far. Ok, it’s a fair point as a generality. But then he starts spouting numbers that are clearly hyperbolic bait. For instance: “They had 500 tanks at the beginning, now they have 5,000. They had 20,000 soldiers, now they have 400,000.”

All of these figures are categorically wrong, and laughably so. Ukraine had far more than 500 tanks, and they certainly don’t have even a fraction of 5,000 now. Ukraine didn’t “start with 20k” troops at the beginning of the SMO either. It’s well known they had at least 200k. So, how much to believe from Prigozhin who clearly tries to inflate everything Ukraine does to drive home his political points. Would he inflate Wagner’s own casualties to do so?

For those wondering, what political point is he making? Well, he also goes into detail about cleansing ‘Russia’s ranks’ and who he would appoint for the various MOD positions (Mizintsev and Surovikin, for those wondering), wink, wink. Is he giving us a clue here? As to his presidential aspirations, perhaps? It would serve him well to present himself as the wise and noble savior of a decadent Russia.

Anyway, we don’t know if he’s referring to Bakhmut only, or Soledar as well, where a Wagner commander once stated that the AFU lost 10,000 alone.

In this video, ex-Russian GRU and Wagner commander ‘Lotus’, whom I talked about before as being possibly the theater commander of Bakhmut, stated in this earlier interview that the Wagner to AFU loss ratio was 1:6 or 1:7 in favor of Wagner. And this is the guy that would know far better, as he’s an actual awarded commander who creates the tactics and strategies and leads the troops on the frontline, rather than Prigozhin who acts more as the ‘CEO’ and spokesperson.

What it could mean is either:

  1. Prigozhin’s numbers are off or
  2. Wagner’s casualties took a sharp upturn during the last bit of Bakhmut, which is for obvious reasons very believable. After all, it’s what appeared to send Prigozhin into apoplectic rage. Whether it was the late diminution of ammo he spoke of which led to this, or simply the climactic, tooth-and-nail nature of the battles for the final quarters of the city, where a tenacious AFU tried desperately to hang on by pouring everything they had into it.

Recall that this AFU officer admitted they lose two companies per day in Bakhmut. The Bakhmut battle was said to go nearly 250 days and if we give them the benefit of the doubt, and assume their companies are very understaffed, perhaps we can get something like 300-400 men lost per day x 250 = 75,000 – 100,000.

Either way, we likely have a good base floor and ceiling for roughly where their losses are.

The other interesting thing this scenario presents however, is that both Ukraine supporters and 5th columnist 2D bloggers are now put in a bit of a conundrum. You see, they spent months taking Prigozhin’s word as gospel. Telling us how much of a rarity his frank and unvarnished honesty is, amongst the Russian military. All the woes and internecine squabbles he raged about were reported as unequivocal fact, and anyone who dared challenge Prigozhin’s heroic anti-establishment, salt-of-the-earth honesty was deemed a ‘Kremlin apologist’.

So now: where do they stand? The Ukro-supporters and 5th columnists claimed Ukraine had a lopsided KIA ratio disparity against Wagner and it was in fact Wagner that was being slaughtered by the thousands in endless waves of ‘meat assaults’. The AFU was supposed to have only suffered a minor flesh wound by comparison, maybe 2-3k dead or less. But instead, he revealed with frank honesty, higher Wagner losses than expected, but even much higher AFU ones. Is Prigozhin now suddenly a liar? Will they hand pick the numbers they want to use? “Well he must be lying about the AFU’s numbers, but look over there at how many Wagners have died!”

It’ll be interesting to see them squirm through the cognitive dissonance to explain away that contradiction. You can’t have it both ways, either he’s a liar or his truth is gospel.

But this hypocritical double standard is a common tactic for Western supporters. To wit, note that even with Strelkov, the West conveniently picked and chose facts that fit their narrative: Back when the Donbass war was started in 2014, Strelkov was ‘definitely a Russian FSB/GRU’ agent working for the Kremlin who can’t be trusted.

Now that Strelkov happens to be spewing some doom-and-gloom that comports with Western narrative, he’s suddenly a sterling and proven commander who certainly knows what he’s talking about when it comes to war, so his opinion that Russia is losing must surely be the truth. Not to mention they now support the position that he was a lone wolf who went rogue all along, proving the disingenuous inconsistency that plagues the dishonest Western commentators.

Either way, if Prigozhin’s numbers are true, my own sensible estimate was certainly much closer to the reality than the wildly exaggerated figures of most West/Ukraine supporters and 5th columnists, who claimed anywhere between 50-100k Wagners were killed in Bakhmut.

For what it’s worth, Prigozhin added the following words:

“PMC Wagner has no exhaustion. More than 10.000 people join to Wagner every month,” Prigozhin for the American magazine Newsweek.

On the other hand, the mystery surrounding Kiev’s losses in general continues to grow with every hour. A French outlet recently made waves when they reported that they’ve lost contact with 40-60% of the AFU personnel who’ve trained in France in 2022, concluding that: “We think they’ve already died in battle.”

💀 “The data on Ukraine’s losses remain Zelensky’s biggest secret,” write the French outlet Valerus.

Questions to the military authorities of Ukraine on this issue “cause their anger,” say those journalists who “risk into it.”

– However, from 40 to 60% of Ukrainian military personnel who were trained in France in 2022 no longer get in touch, according to a Valerus source. “We think most are silent because they have already died in battle.”

“There is no doubt that the number of dead and injured has risen sharply since the end of the summer.”

– “After about ten waves of mobilization, the number of those who can serve under the blue-and-yellow flag has noticeably decreased.”

“The nine brigades reconstituted with NATO assistance to prepare for the spring offensive have between 2,500 and 3,000 men each, while there should be between 5,000 and 8,000.”

Now onto the last big news, which is AFU’s incursion into Russia’s Belgorod region. I almost didn’t even want to cover this because I think it to be inconsequential, and to cover it at length is to give Ukraine exactly the type of psychological ‘victory’ they sought with their desperate failed stunt. But alas, I’ll cover it if only to show how miserable of a failure it was.

But first, I’ll say how awed I am that so many people still fall for these stunts and consider them to actually be some major sign of Russia’s impending loss or failure of the SMO. As ex-Austrian army officer, GeromanAT noted on his Twitter:

How people think border defenses work vs. how they actually work:

The fact is, the AFU crept a few hundred meters into the border, got destroyed and ran away. Here’s the checkpoint they made such a big deal about ‘taking over’:

You know how deep into Russia that checkpoint is?

The yellow lines are indicating the Ukrainian border. But the psyop included artillery and MLRS fired from the rear, as well as drones, much deeper into Russia which gave the appearance of their actually having swept through the whole region, which was not the case.

However, the desperate psyop was very elaborately orchestrated—we must admit that.

They carried out a number of simultaneous, sophisticated psychological actions all while bursting through the border with a battalion of mixed units from Kraken, Azov, etc. It was obviously pre-planned for a long time and carried out multi-modally through a variety of hybrid warfare methods.

Here’s a list of the simultaneous actions they carried out in order to create mass panic, demoralization, informational distortion, etc:

  • Attacked the border and rear areas with Uragan MLRS systems
  • Began to try to cut the power of the outlying villages in order to cut communications with further regions
  • Began a mass terror campaign of drone bombing various neighboring cities, including Belgorod itself, which consisted of indiscriminately targeting civilian cars and businesses with bomblets dropped from drones
  • Launched a multitude of spoofing shell channels which pretended to be official community channels for the respective cities/towns in that region. These channels then, under the guise of some authority figure, reported wrong information about mass panic, evacuations, etc.
  • One such psyop campaign involved broadcasting to thousands of people that the militants had broken into a police station and disguised themselves as Russian police. The channel urged all citizens of the region to immediately take up arms and shoot any police officer they see. This last number is particularly cynical, like something out of the Joker’s bag from the Dark Knight movies and demonstrates the levels of depravity and terror that the Ukrainian Nazi regime has stooped to
  • Make fakes about Russian forces retreating, Russian planes and helicopters being downed and destroyed, which didn’t happen
  • Broadcast interviews with one of the leaders of the group who stated that the citizens of Belgorod infact invited the group in because they were sick of the Russian government and wanted the true Russian dissident forces to provide ‘security’ for them
  • Broadcast that Russian nukes are stored nearby and were at risk of being seized
  • Synchronized release of professionally produced fake videos claiming to show a Russian soldier captured as well as a Russian border station chief killed and his office raided

Here are sample photos of the civilian cars destroyed in a mass drone terror campaign in the region that day:

They also shot up many cars, took hostages inside homes and killed/injured several civilians.

Here are two of their devious pysops. They created a fake channel for the town of Grayvoron, and spread the disinformation that the governor defected to the militants. And the second is the request for all citizens to open fire on the police:

It’s so deviously cynical you almost have to respect it for its boldness. And yet, it’s like a child’s game for sickos. Does anyone actually think such paltry, feckless, and inane little games can win you a war? But I suppose we must look at it from their perspective: they have nothing else. Wouldn’t you do the same in their shoes? They’re really trying.

Here’s an example of their psyop: on the left shows their channel which was originally established as Vinnytsia Live at the beginning of last year. But in preparation for yesterday’s psyop, they changed the channel’s name to Grayvoron Live to carry out their info attack:

Here’s what one Russian analyst had to say about the operation:

Dedicated to everyone who is looking for yellow scotch tape and cartoons on the corpses of killed Nazis, whose photos have been scattered around the network.

Yesterday I wrote [ t.me/notes_veterans/9584 ] that up to a battalion of Nazi personnel was involved in the attack on Russian territory. The composition was motley – “Kraken”, “Azov”, “RDK”, Kharkov Terodefense, and a number of other units that carry out the main service in the border areas, in this particular case in Velikaya Pisarevka.

“Azov”, “Kraken” and “RDK” in fashionable multicam and pasted with tape like parrots came to shoot tik tok, their home video shooting was covered by the very auxiliary units of the Kharkiv Terodefense and the military of the Armed Forces of Ukraine that serve in Velyka Pisarevka.

Tik tokers from “Azov”, “Kraken” and “RDK” already by 12 o’clock on May 22, 2023, having filmed the content, dumped from the territory of Russia, leaving the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the MAP “Grayvoron” to “cover” their departure. It was them that our artillery guns petted, and the infantry subsequently collected the corpses. Such things are small.

And here’s one Ukrainian channel’s version of what the secret operation was actually all about:

And reportedly it is true, that Russia did in fact once store nuclear weapons at this storage base nearby:

Geolocation: 50.564436746379215, 35.736953217001755

MSM channels like Newsweek even sprang into action with such headlines:

However, this appears to be another part of the info war psyop as it was the Ukrainian MOD that “confirmed” these facts. Russian channels on the other hand report that Russia had long ago removed the nukes from this ‘Belgorod-22’ storage site.

So, how did the rest of the story pan out? Local Russian territorial forces kept the elite Ukrainian assault group at bay until General Lapin arrived with his ground forces and mopped the rest of them up:

Not to mention, all the while, the Russian airforce was hammering them mercilessly from the skies, inflicting a reported 70+ casualties with guided strikes on their vehicles at the border checkpoint. Here’s a medley which shows the entire incident in compressed form, from start to finish; the incursion, followed by the defeat:

Ukrainian National Security secretary Danilov verbalized what the real goal of the incursion was in this interview:

The point is to create uprisings of scared and fed up Russian citizens against their government, to destabilize the Kremlin. Naturally, he states these border DRG diversions will increase in many other regions, including Kursk.

Now they’re trying to save face by claiming this was merely a ‘raid’. However, uncovered fortifications showed they were actually digging trenches and had meant to dig in and occupy the villages:

Good job, I guess. You lost an entire company of men, over a dozen total vehicles, for what? Oh, that’s right—we know exactly what it achieved:

The blue line shows ‘Bakhmut’ searches on the internet, the red line is ‘Belgorod Oblast’. Guess which narrative was suddenly swept under the rug in brisk fashion as soon as this psyop was launched?

Note that Bakhmut was liberated on the 20th, when its searches shot up and was conveniently and predictably sandbagged by the fake raid.

So what did this achieve? Did it buy another few days for Narco-Führer Zelensky to beg for more F-16s? Did it buy an extra week for comatose Zaluzhny’s brain to reduce swelling?

Oh, let me guess. It “exposed” how weak Russian border defenses are, is that the narrative? Well, if they’re so weak, then why did Russia lose almost no men while an entire battalion of the most elite units of the AFU (Kraken, Azov, etc.) was hastily driven back with a large part of them liquidated, their vehicles destroyed? Were the elite AFU forces not able to withstand ‘weak’ Russian border conscripts?

To me, this mass delusion is akin to the infamous survivorship bias, which is defined roughly as a logical fallacy of concentrating on instances where something has passed a selection process, while overlooking instances that did not. So, for example Ukraine constantly makes attacks on Russian lines, including border areas. No one bats an eye when hundreds of such attacks are destroyed and driven back every month, no merit or recognition is awarded to Russia. But when one measly attack gets a few hundred meters in, suddenly it’s the end of the world and the AFU is celebrated.

It’s also compounded by a large dose of recency bias. For instance, Russia shot down several Ukrainian aircraft this week, including a Mig-29 today, but that just passes through the sieve. But when a single Russian craft is shot down, it’s considered a major blow—which is illogical as it’s much more of a major blow for the country with almost no aircraft to have one shot down, rather than for the country which has the second largest airforce on earth.

The same goes for Russian gains and advances. The little Belgorod escapade naturally screened the fact that Russia just made more inroads in several theaters, including gains in Kremennaya, Kupyansk, and a new important gain in Belgorovka, near Seversk, which Russian forces are now almost encircling:

⏺ Ukrainian sources report that the situation on the front around Seversk has worsened

▪️According to his statements, the crew in Belogorovka found themselves in semi-encirclement, as the Russian army launched an attack from several directions, where they managed to achieve certain tactical successes that enable it to act in the rear of the Ukrainian forces.

📌 The local road connecting Belogorovka with Serebryanka, and further with Severska (about 12 km as the crow flies) is particularly at risk.

The Ukrainian command announces that at this moment extraordinary efforts are being made to improve the situation.

But is this to completely dismiss all the legitimate concerns, complaints, etc., about the incident? No, of course not. The Belgorod incident has spurred the usual bacchanalia of teeth-gnashing rage and worry. Much of it is in fact healthy. There are legitimate concerns about the situation and why, despite being beaten back, the AFU units were able to incur into Russia to begin with.

There is a multitude of perspectives from every station, such as this reported post about how Russian EW is too strong for its own good, hampering Russia’s own drones in the region:

👉👉👉 Apparently a post from a Russian military man…

The first problem is our Electronic warfare. Artillery would be happy to fire back, but for it to be useful, they need to see where to fire, and not just shoot at the sound, somewhere “there”. To do this, it is necessary to raise a drone. Which, because of our own EW, is not always possible. It is impossible to get higher than 30 meters near the border, and often the drone even “goes crazy” and begins to perform. There was a case of an acquaintance when a Matris 300 flew to the Ukrainians. Now in order to skip our EW, my crew has to look for “holes”. Of course we know some places to fly from, but this is not a solution either. It’s not safe to fly from the same place every time. But the bummer is that the Ukrainians are now switching en masse to

433, 1.2, 1.4 MHz, and our EW squeezes the most common frequencies used in the Mavic. Consequently, the Ukrainians misses our EW more often. So it turns out that we crush our drones, depriving our artillery of prompt fire, because each battery does not have its own “Eagle”(Orlan-10), but has a Mavic. And Khohol has adapted and bypasses our EW by changing frequencies.

But these are all problems which can be addressed and fixed.

Another sensible complaint:

There are a lot of questions about the situation in the Grayvoronsky district for our intelligence and not only intelligence.

1. Why were the enemy’s attack plans not revealed at the initial stage of the preparation of the operation?

2. Why weren’t they opened and worked out to prevent the movement of the enemy on the way to the state border?

3. Why did the border guards and the military have to leave the first line of defense?

4. Why are civilians still living in settlements that are 1 kilometer from the border (in fact, the front line), because of which artillery and aviation could not inflict fire damage on the enemy?

5. Why are people who want to defend their land still not armed and are in sham “terodefense”, and not in the extermination squads of the people’s militia?

The above highlights another issue, which was that the region has a 3,000 man, several battalion strong force which wants to fight and provide security, but—according to them—due to the bureaucratic nightmare of the Russian government, they have not yet been issued weapons; the Russian MOD is famously cautious and painstaking when it comes to such things.

But a lot of the issues were also greatly exaggerated and amplified, as per the guidelines of the psychological operation, by the AFU group, and so it’s difficult to know for absolute certain how much of it is true.

Certainly there is a growing critical mass of people, at least in the information field, who are losing patience with the Russian MOD’s way of dealing with things. I mean this in a general sense, even if they handled the situation decently well on the ground, people have found the informational aspect highly inadequate. Some have complained, for instance, that the MOD waited for a whole day or more to show the losses of the AFU, all while ceding the informational space fully to the UA psyop, allowing them and their words, images, and deeds to dominate the information space. I’m definitely sympathetic to that angle.

Another top Russian account angrily posted the following:

Unofficial Bezsonov “Z”: “The rhetoric of our speakers and media on the breakthrough of saboteurs in the Belgorod region: “we will squeeze out”, “they pushed us back”, etc. Are you on the fun side!? The war is on. Saboteurs need to be killed, destroyed, and eliminated. You understand that rhetoric is very important. Our front-line soldiers read the news and get fucked up. People often ask me why they were sent to war to actually kill their enemies, and all the officials are afraid to even say that.”

Even the famous FighterBomber channel agreed with the sentiment, stating how the morale of Russia’s airmen operating over the Belgorod region during this flare up was affected after the fake about a ‘shot down’ Russian helicopter was broadcast by Russian channels. The Ukrainian assault group, by the way, was said to have advanced with an Avenger AD system covering them as well as a large amount of manpads.

So, yes, there are problems. There will always be problems. They are being worked out and worked on constantly. But how can, in the minds of some people afflicted with the worst cases of the aforementioned logical fallacies and biases, could these relatively minor problems possibly overshadow not only the fact that Russia destroyed the group and pushed them out, but the general fact that Russia is handily winning the war and has just captured Bakhmut?

But all this brings me to the final topic. It took no great skill of course to predict this Belgorod incursion—I myself as well as almost every analyst on the planet have said weeks ago that this would happen as a distraction effort to both shore up the failings of Bakhmut, but more importantly to attempt to ‘shape the battlefield’ (both psychologically and physically) in preparation for UA’s expected offensive.

The most logical strategy employed was to try and pull Russian forces from another theater, i.e. the south all the way to the north to thin out the south’s defenses on the eve of a potential offensive.

It does appear that the UA assault group had plans to dig in, not only based on the discovered trenches they were in the process of digging, but the fact that a larger force was continually spotted by Russian drones in Velyka Pysarovka—which is the Ukrainian town right on the other side of the border—which was meant to be the reserve that ‘pushes through’ past the dug-in gains of the first vanguard element. The point being that the operation appears to have potentially been planned as a much larger one than we think, with the intention of taking over the entire local region, digging in, and creating a huge problem requiring Russia to immediately commit reinforcements from the southern direction to enter into a protracted pitched battle against the occupying forces. And it may very well not be over yet; they appear to have retreated for now but they may attempt to reconstitute and continue trying, so we’ll see what happens.

But my point was that, this could presage the coming of the UA offensive. GUR chief Budanov stated yesterday that the offensive is coming “very soon”, though those words are relative. And I always said that things would begin to accelerate on the eve of a potential offensive. Recall that Zelensky was trying to postpone things with Bakhmut and several sources on both sides stated that Ukraine’s offensive would begin after the fall of Bakhmut. Zelensky can’t afford for Russia to take the Bakhmut capture momentum in force and continue going forward or even launch their own more major offensive.

All the possible convergences have arrived and it feels that we’re at that singular point. And now that UA has begun these major psychological ops on the Russian border, it could be the last precursor to shape the field and try to rearrange Russian forces into favorable postures at the final hour.

Now there are rumors—low confidence of course, but worth sharing just in case—that NATO intends to ‘do something’ during their upcoming June exercises described as “largest ever”:

NATO is preparing to hold its largest-ever air exercises this June, known as Exercise Air Defender, that will involve 220 aircraft and 10,0000 personnel from 24 nations.

The drills will include a massive deployment of aircraft from the US Air National Guard, which is tasked with defending the homeland but, according to Defense One, also maintains units for “prompt mobilization during war.” –Zerohedge

“The exercises will mark the largest US air forces deployment to Europe for NATO drills since the alliance was founded in 1949.”

The purpose of the drills is to simulate what the US would have to do if the war in Ukraine spread into NATO territory.

“This is now putting the alliance together quickly, with a credible force, to make sure that if Russia ever lines up on the NATO border, that we’re ready to go,” said Lt. Gen. Michael Loh, the head of the Air National Guard. “We’re going to defend every inch.”

The drills will take place from June 12-23 and will stretch from Iceland to Romania, with most flights taking place over Germany and the North Sea. The massive show of force is a clear message to Russia and comes as the US and NATO are escalating support for their proxy war against Moscow in Ukraine.

They openly state that the exercise is to show Russia that they’re “ready to go”, whatever that means.

The more fringe of the rumors claims that NATO plans to launch a massive undercover strike on Russian assets. While that’s very unlikely, what is likely is using the exercises as cover for UA to launch their own offensive, particularly with unprecedented numbers of NATO troops all around in the region, perhaps some of them or their assets can be brought to bear without setting off Russian alarm bells.

I’ve said time and time again that military exercises are the most classic ruse in history for staging falseflags and secretly deploying armies to theaters in preparation for attacks. Russia itself used this common ruse at the start of the SMO, if you’ll recall. The huge joint exercises with Belarus were used as smokescreen to move Russian units in position before launching the mass invasion. It’s one of the oldest and most predictable tricks in the book.

And since I’ve previously outlined that summer is the final chance for Ukraine to launch its offensive, as autumn starts getting back into the whole heavy rains and mud rasputitsa cycle, that means June could be the prime launching date. Which is also partly why many of history’s most renowned operations were always launched at that time, such as, famously, Barbarossa on June 22 and Normandy D-Day landings on June 6.

I gave the reason in the last report: since autumn isn’t ideal, late summer likewise proves questionable because you need some headroom for your operation to spread its legs and gain some actual returns. What’s the use launching late summer only to get bogged down in rains and mud only a few short weeks later? Early summer is ideal so you can have the full breadth of the season to push your big gains, so of course, logically, June is the favored month. The only question that remains is whether the AFU is ready, and who is even leading them? A cerebro-cranially trepanated Zaluzhny?

You’ve got to admit though, the narrative is perfect, it fits the Brawny American style: under the cover of the largest exercises in history, with silver NATO birds spanning the skies with their grand show of strength, and here comes the AFU, symbolically now under the NATO banner to decimate the Russian lines at a time when the headlines of both the exercises and attack bleed over and create a sort of parallel reality distortion where, to the droopy-eyed Western observer, it may all look like one grand action movie, where the beleaguered orc hordes are being driven back to Mordor by the stupendous NATO forces. It would be too easy for the empire’s scribes to confect such a deliciously alluring narrative, would it not?

Also, consider this low confidence as well, but there are reports that U.S. congressmen are being issued emergency satellite phones for a potential ‘disruptive event’:

Many have pointed out that a lot of strange incidents have occurred, like the 30 tons of explosives “going missing” from a California train. To wit:

Could the elites be getting ready for some major black swan events tied into the NATO exercises and coming Ukraine offensive? I did point out last time how famed futures forecaster Martin Armstrong said there won’t even be a 2024 election and that the U.S. won’t exist after 2032. The globalists do need a desperate black swan type event to save Ukraine, and their own asses, as it’s the only thing that can really stop Russia from winning.

Most likely it is nothing—but it’s grist for the mill and worth mentioning/discussing. The next 12 to 18 months promise to be quite eventful, that’s for sure.

A couple last items:

The Russian Black Sea ship Ivan Khurs was attacked by Ukrainian naval drones near the Bosporus Strait while it was patrolling the Turkish Stream pipeline. Russian sharpshooters on the deck of the ship took out all drones in spectacular fashion with their handy 14.5mm KPV HMG deck guns:

This appears to be the standard Ukrainian naval drone used many times before:

Here’s the location of the action:

What do you see there on the far right side, likely directing the drones? Surprise, surprise—the American RQ-4 Global Hawk just happened to be doing a fly over at the time. It remains one of my chief contentions against the Russian MOD that these drones should have been shot down long ago, with no qualms. Let U.S. futilely raise hell in the UN and cry, it’s proven they won’t dare do anything, as Russia already took down their MQ-9. These are unmanned systems after all, it’s not like they’d be killing an American serviceman. With that said, Rybar does report the following, which is promising:

More recently, the NATO RQ-4D Phoenix UAV left the patrol area with emergency code 7600 – and this is a damn pleasant fact, which means that Russian electronic warfare suppressed the electronic warfare control channel, forcing them to leave the water area. Yes, the measure is temporary – the UAV will return in the following days.

But before we had no such measures.

Yes, now it is only the use of electronic warfare forces, but maybe in the future we can count on something more? In the end, one UAV has already gone to the bottom of the Black Sea.

Apparently Russia is jamming the RQ-4s, making them spout emergency codes and flee back to base.

Another interesting item:

Russian S-350 Vityaz, an advanced, modern variant that’s actually closer to the S-400 (using the same missiles) than the S-300, reportedly took down several AFU aircraft, including a plane and several drones, in full AI mode.

“The operator simply did not interfere in the operation of the complex, in the automatic operation algorithm chosen by the machine,” the source said.

Sputnik reports:

Russia’s S-350 Vityaz surface-to-air missile (SAM) system shot down Ukrainian aircraft in the special operation zone in fully automatic mode, without the participation of an operator, a well-informed source told Sputnik.

The source said that “for the first time in the world the Vityaz performed the fully automated detection, tracking and destruction of Ukrainian air targets in combat; the surface-to-air missiles downed several Ukrainian warplanes and unmanned aerial vehicles.

According to the insider, “the automatic mode was implemented on the basis of the principle that a person does not cancel the decisions of the SAM’s artificial intelligence elements within the framework of the emerging air combat situation, namely, an operator just did not interfere in the running of the system, thus confirming the operation algorithm chosen by the machine.

The sources explained that the Vityaz simultaneously worked in active and passive radar modes, something that boosts the SAM’s jamming immunity, as well as its ability to detect and classify targets.

Well, as exciting as that sounds, let’s hope they don’t let these AI run too wild before it starts deciding to shoot down every Russian air group like the four lost weeks ago.

A heartwarming item:

Simferopol, 9 years later: a meeting between the girl Anya and the Russian soldier

In February 2014, at the very beginning of the Russian spring, while still a little girl, Anya approached Mikhail and hugged him. This small but touching episode was captured by cameras and flew around millions of people across the country and inspired the creator of the famous monument to ‘Polite People’.

The above famous video shows one of the ‘little green men’ aka ‘polite people’ who took Crimea in 2014. When the little girl hugged him, it was caught on cameras and inspired an emblematic monument which stands there to this day:

But now, the soldier, revealed as Mikhail, is still participating in the SMO and has a reunion with the little girl, all grown up, nine years later:

Mikhail is participating in the special operation, now he’s in the Crimea on vacation and is preparing to return to the front line. After 9 years, he met the girl Anya, gave her a basket of flowers, a bear and the same chocolate bar that he handed to the girl in 2014.

“I had the last call today. And when I met you, I just had begun school, and now we met when I have a graduation,” says Anya.

A penultimate item: Head of DPR Dennis Pushilin peremptorily settles the Bakhmut debate once and for all. It is now officially Artemovsk, period, end of story!

Bakhmut is Artemovsk, end of conversation. – Denis Pushilin during his visit of Artemovsk

“Bakhmut is the name from the Russian Empire. But under the Soviet Union it was called Artemovsk, that’s how we remember it. Moreover, there is a corresponding decree that states that all the names of cities and districts within the borders of the former Donetsk region of Ukraine return to May 11, 2014 year,” the head of the DPR said.

It’ll take some getting used to!

And lastly, German Defense Minister Pistorius, echoing various technofascist eurocrats like Von der Lyin’ and Josep Borrell before him, says the quiet part out loud about Ukraine:


POLL

Is NATO/West planning some devious action during upcoming mass exercises?

Yes.

No.

486 VOTES · 6 DAYS REMAINING

POLL

Will Ukraine finally launch their offensive in June?

Yes, they have no choice.

No, just more falseflags & psyops.

455 VOTES · 6 DAYS REMAINING

Here’s Germany’s Defense Minister with the last word:

If we stopped supplying weapons to Ukraine today, the end of Ukraine would come >tomorrow<. You want to accept it, but we don’t want to do it,” –

Boris Pistorius, German Defence Minister. 25 May 2023

EPA Has a Bad Day — Wetlands Must be Constitutionally Defined Waters

The Supreme Court limited the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority over wetlands, the latest in a series of decisions reining in federal agencies. 

Held: The CWA’s use of “waters” in §1362(7) refers only to “geographic[al] features that are described in ordinary parlance as ‘streams, oceans, rivers, and lakes’ ” and to adjacent wetlands that are “indistinguishable” from those bodies of water due to a continuous surface connection. Rapanos v. United States, 547 U. S. 715, 755, 742, 739 (plurality opinion). To assert jurisdiction over an adjacent wetland under the CWA, a party must establish “first, that the adjacent [body of water constitutes] . . . ‘water[s] of the United States’ (i.e., a relatively permanent body of water connected to traditional interstate navigable waters); and second, that the wetland has a continuous surface connection with that water, making it difficult to determine where the ‘water’ ends and the ‘wetland’ begins.” Ibid. Pp. 6–28.

Decision: Click to access 21-454_4g15.pdf

Kim DotCom Introduces “The Whistleblower”: How the Biden Regime Blew Up Nord Stream Under Zhou’s Orders

***************************************

The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory is a not-for-profit university affiliated research center (UARC) that solves complex research, engineering, and analytical problems that present critical challenges to our nation.

JHUAPL scientists, engineers, and analysts serve as trusted advisors and technical experts to the government, ensuring the reliability of complex technologies that safeguard our nation’s security and advance the frontiers of space. JHUAPL also maintains independent research and development programs that pioneer and explore emerging technologies and concepts to address future national priorities.

As Kim reports, the Advanced Seal Delivery System (ASDS) is a covert mini-submarine designed for the Navy Seals to carry out stealthy clandestine missions. This submarine is transported on the back of nuclear submarines and detaches to execute its missions.

Here is an ASDS riding on the back of USS Greenville (SSN 772), a Los Angeles-class nuclear-powered attack submarine (SSN)

RAND Corporation discusses ASDS technology here: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/documented_briefings/2005/DB352.pdf